* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]: > What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the > original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set > headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting.
i got that. however, you did not describe what the goal of *your* setup should be. > What I want is to test if there is a To-header or not - if > there is one, I'm mailing, if there is none, I'm posting. hmm.. ok. i think. (i do not know what else the NNTP patches offer.) > If I'm mailing, add a Bcc header (I'm Bccing > all mail to myself to keep track of it). > If not, do not add this header because > this results in an ugly "To: undiclosed > recipients ;" line in my postings. If you just want mutt to keep a copy of all your messages depending on Email or Usenet then why not set FCC instead? Why *send* a copy? > I've tried an otherwise empty .muttrc file and > send-hook . "unmy_hdr *" > send-hook '~t ..*' 'my_hdr Bcc: mail' > send-hook !'~t ..*' 'my_hdr Bcc: news' fcc-hook '~t .' +MAIL fcc-hook '! ~t .' +NEWS Isn't this easier? > Testing the settings: > 1. (mail) no bcc > 2. (mail) bcc: mail > 3. (news) bcc: mail > 4. (news) bcc: news > So it seems to work, but the > send-hook is "one message late". huh? Sven -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html
