* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]: [...] > If you just want mutt to keep > a copy of all your messages > depending on Email or Usenet > then why not set FCC instead? > > Why *send* a copy? [...] > fcc-hook '~t .' +MAIL > fcc-hook '! ~t .' +NEWS > > Isn't this easier?
I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my mail in one place, my compi at home. Where I use fcc-hooks BTW. > > > Testing the settings: > > 1. (mail) no bcc > > 2. (mail) bcc: mail > > 3. (news) bcc: mail > > 4. (news) bcc: news > > So it seems to work, but the > > send-hook is "one message late". > > huh? [sigh] this means I'm trying to send 4 messages for test purposes (mail, then mail, then news, then news). Send-hooks trying to set Bcc headers do not effect the current but the next message! -Andre
msg25651/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
