Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Hi again :-) I just thought of a simpler and potentially easier answer to this whole thing. Since you've already stepped up to the work of configuring *your* environment (the aliases file) for these folks who can't get it together, why not just configure your procmail setup to recognize any of t

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hello all, and sorry for the delay. I'm in exams. I hope they've gone well! % % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mutt users: % % > aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] % > % > would automatically readdress any email for % >

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-22 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000: > My understanding was that *replying* to a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] would > address the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I can find uses for this too. Some mailing lists around here can be > reached via multiple aliases -- [EMAIL PRO

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-22 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400, David T-G wrote: > I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand > that a configuration like > > aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? My

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-21 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Stan Ryckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000: > This is sort of a guess as well, since I'm going from memory, but > what I think was asked. My understanding was that he wanted to specify the "display name" for several mail addresses, in the mail folder view. This is what $reverse_a

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-21 Thread Stan Ryckman
At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote: >On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote: >> Daniel -- >> >> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. > >I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking >for the 'alias' setting?

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-21 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote: > Daniel -- > > I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking for the 'alias' setting? I am so used to the term 'alias' because I've always

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-20 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand that a configuration like aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If that's correct, I don't see why that's needed; just send you