e new name as a link, then
unlink the old name.
Try sorting the directories according to mtime with ls -lt (or -ltr
for reverse order).
You've missed the point (I think), in a maildir the directories whose
mtime dates change are the cur, new and tmp directories. The parent
directory whose name
s of the named
> > 'maildir directory' there seems to be no practical way to do sorting
> > of maildirs on anything but name.
> >
> > What I'd really like to be able to do is to sort on date of last
> > message.
> >
> > For example I have a
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Is there any way that one can overcome this major disadvantage of
maildir?
Since maildir messages are saved in sub-directories of the named
'maildir directory' there seems to be no practical way to do sorting
of maildirs o
Is there any way that one can overcome this major disadvantage of
maildir?
Since maildir messages are saved in sub-directories of the named
'maildir directory' there seems to be no practical way to do sorting
of maildirs on anything but name.
What I'd really like to be able to d
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 04:22:59PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > Anything other than alphabatical sorting is pretty useless with a long
> > > list of directories, especially as it often puts .. somewhere other
> > > than at the top.
> [...]
> > I have a
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:04:53AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Rene Kita wrote:
> > Additionally I have the following macro to make the folder browser
> > always show the configured mailboxes:
> > macro index c "?" "open a different folder"
> > macro
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Rene Kita wrote:
Additionally I have the following macro to make the folder browser
always show the configured mailboxes:
macro index c "?" "open a different folder"
macro pager c "?" "open a different folder"
was added in Mutt 1.13 and is bound by de
27;.
Additionally I have the following macro to make the folder browser
always show the configured mailboxes:
macro index c "?" "open a different folder"
macro pager c "?" "open a different folder"
> Anything other than alphabatical sorting is pretty useless wi
irectory,
> what about if it contains further subdirectories?
>
> date - date of what? If it's just the date of the directory it's
> not terribly useful!
>
> size - does it work or mean anything with maildir?
>
> unread - what does this mean?
>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:23:26AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a about 40 or so folders where I save mails I want to keep,
> with names such as 'shopping', 'motorcycle' and so on. By default
> these are sorted alphabetically in the index which is not ideal. I
> save things in 'shopping' fa
I have a about 40 or so folders where I save mails I want to keep,
with names such as 'shopping', 'motorcycle' and so on. By default
these are sorted alphabetically in the index which is not ideal. I
save things in 'shopping' far more frequently than elsewhere so it
would be really handy if that
* Paolo Pisati [18.10.2012 10:43]:
> i don't know what's your problem but i can give you a suggestion: use
> offlineimap.
Thanks for your feed back. I just started using offlineimap for my
private mail account. Haven't done it for my work mails yet since I
cannot just download all of the folders
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:32:01PM +0200, Chris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I start mutt to connect to my IMAP account at work (which is a
> David / Tobit server) mutt downloads the headers of my approximately 700
> mails in my inbox within a minute or so. When it is afterwords sorting
&
Hi,
when I start mutt to connect to my IMAP account at work (which is a
David / Tobit server) mutt downloads the headers of my approximately 700
mails in my inbox within a minute or so. When it is afterwords sorting
the mailbox it is staying there forever. Sometimes it finishes after
maybe 15
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:54:38PM +0100, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Yue Wu schrieb am 16.11.2010 um 15:06 (+0800):
>
> > Do you use vim? vim's widemode option is in the form that I've
> > described just above.
>
> I can't find any Vim option by that name in either my Vim online
> manual - VIM 7.3 (
Yue Wu schrieb am 16.11.2010 um 15:06 (+0800):
> Do you use vim? vim's widemode option is in the form that I've
> described just above.
I can't find any Vim option by that name in either my Vim online
manual - VIM 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Aug 19 2010 13:06:02) - nor
in Google. Maybe you misspel
;
>> sort_aux is by thread then by other sort rule, right?
>>
>> Sorry maybe I didn't describe myself clearly, subject is for example,
>> if I want by sender then subject, how to do it?
>
> sort_aux should work with whatever $sort you've set, not just threads
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:14:15PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 12:15, Yue Wu wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 09:04, Yue Wu wrote:
> > > > Hi, list,
> > > >
> > > > mutt can sort index
On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 12:15, Yue Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 09:04, Yue Wu wrote:
> > > Hi, list,
> > >
> > > mutt can sort index by rules like date, thread, etc., but the rule is
> > > too simple, sometim
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 09:04, Yue Wu wrote:
> > Hi, list,
> >
> > mutt can sort index by rules like date, thread, etc., but the rule is
> > too simple, sometimes I want to sort the email by subject then by date
> > or revers
On Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 09:04, Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi, list,
>
> mutt can sort index by rules like date, thread, etc., but the rule is
> too simple, sometimes I want to sort the email by subject then by date
> or reverse date, or by From then by reverse date, seems it's not
> possible in mutt
Hi, list,
mutt can sort index by rules like date, thread, etc., but the rule is
too simple, sometimes I want to sort the email by subject then by date
or reverse date, or by From then by reverse date, seems it's not
possible in mutt at present.
Will the feature be added in future? Or no one has t
lowed by my prompt:
>Sorting mailbox... Segmentation fault
A several things you can do (without me reading through the config file) to
debug are:
1) Compile mutt with the debug configure flag and activate it using the "-d 5"
switch/arg. (Debug configure flag is likely already compi
Hello,
I just registered to this mailing list so i can finaly start using mutt.
I installed mutt-sidebar from the archlinux aur and got offlineIMAP to work.
Now when i start mutt i just get this one line followed by my prompt:
Sorting mailbox... Segmentation fault
My muttrc
Hi,
i have been using mutt for quite some time on a maildir.
my inbox is sorted with "set sort=date-received" which worked nicely until i
used "set header_cache" to speed up starting up mutt a bit. now my inbox is no
longer sorted by the date on which the mails were received. is this a bug or
> Sounds like you might be interested in mairix:
>
> http://www.rpcurnow.force9.co.uk/mairix/
Thanks for the suggestion, but this utility amounts to a search and
indexing tool in Maildir, but a mail directory is not where my files
(not all obtained bia SMTP) are located. Because I work topically
On 2009-05-07, jac...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:31, Haines Brown
> > To save a message in mutt, if I hit the "s" key I'm prompted
> > for a mailbox. However I'm used to saving messages as a plain text
>
> I was super confused on this same issue for a while. Every so often i
> ne
* Haines Brown on Friday, May 08, 2009 at 07:28:39 -0400
> Sorry to have dragged things off topic, but in short, my immediate
> question was resolved, which is that I can name a message whatever I
> want and subsequently move it from ~/Mail to where I want it. I work
> on material in terms of their
> That's probably more information than you needed, but maybe that helps
> you understand why mutt is doing what it's doing.
No, Kyle, the information was useful. Thank you.
> Hmm. Okay, I have a better idea of *what* you're doing, but still not
> *why* you're doing it. Is this large and comple
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:31, Haines Brown
> To save a message in mutt, if I hit the "s" key I'm prompted
> for a mailbox. However I'm used to saving messages as a plain text
I was super confused on this same issue for a while. Every so often i
need a plain text copy of an email with headers and e
ft over from VAX and DOS.
I use email primarily to obtain text and documents from one source
that I store in a very large and complex directory tree (perhaps
several thousand directories) by using a file manager to move them
where they are dumpted to their ultimate location. These documents
need a un
I store in a very large and complex directory tree (perhaps
> several thousand directories) by using a file manager to move them
> where they are dumpted to their ultimate location. These documents
> need a unique name to identify their location for sorting, to give
> some idea of thei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 7 at 01:31 PM, quoth Haines Brown:
> I guess the most straightforward procedure would be to rely on
> procmail to direct incoming mail to differet inboxes that rmail and
> mutt can access.
Probably, yup.
> You were kind to reply,
Kyle, I've got a lot to learn about mutt :-(. I guess the most
straightforward procedure would be to rely on procmail to direct
incoming mail to differet inboxes that rmail and mutt can access.
You were kind to reply, but your message starts with the set of lines
below. Were you trying to tell me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 7 at 09:14 AM, quoth Haines Brown:
>>> I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail
>>> servers.
>>
>> And it's delivered to different mail folders?
>
> That's the problem. While I can tell mutt to read the mail in a
eally ugly folder-hooks that do sorting for you from within
mutt) but these are a pain to write and debug/test.
Rocco
> > I started with the idea I could configure mutt to accomplish the goal
> > I describe below, but I'm not sure I can.
>
> Why not?
>
> > I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail servers.
>
> And it's delivered to different mail folders?
That's the problem. While I can tell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 6 at 05:29 PM, quoth Haines Brown:
> I started with the idea I could configure mutt to accomplish the goal
> I describe below, but I'm not sure I can.
Why not?
> I retrieve mail with fetchmail, which I have poll both mail servers.
I started with the idea I could configure mutt to accomplish the goal
I describe below, but I'm not sure I can.
I get mail from a mail server that receives mail sent to
bro...@hartford-hwp.com. I set up another mail sever to receive mail
for bro...@historicalmaterialism.info. As a result, mail com
o
> create the sort order that you like. But like I said, that would
> require a TON of work.
>
> It would be much easier to ask the developers to make a from-or-to
> sort order (to match the %F field of the index_format). This could be
> painful for the IMAP driver, though, sin
would be much easier to ask the developers to make a from-or-to
sort order (to match the %F field of the index_format). This could be
painful for the IMAP driver, though, since the sorting cannot be done
on the server side.
~Kyle
- --
It is o
A friend has some rather peculiar needs in dealing with large
volumes of mail.
I'm trying to show her mutt, but I've just noticed that sort=from
sorts all the mails from one's self together, which really isn't
what we want.
Is there any way to sort by "from address unless it's mine, in which
cas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, June 15 at 08:40 PM, quoth Don Raikes:
> Another newbie question:
> How do I sort incoming mail by threads. I have looked in the mutt
> manual but haven't found this trick yet.
To sort *any* mailbox by threads, do this:
set sort=thre
iHello,
Another newbie question:
How do I sort incoming mail by threads. I have looked in the mutt manual but
haven't found this trick yet.
set duplicate_threads=yes ;\
Not really. Mutt's threading is implemented as a sorting mechanism
rather than some other layer, and unfortunately mutt is coded in
multiple places to honor only two sort functions.
Daniel Eisenbud did the last major overhaul of mutt's threading code.
Sho
0n Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
>=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Fri 30.May'08 at 11:38:20 +0800 -=
>
>> Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading
>> whilst viewing messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
>
>So you want a threaded sc
=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Fri 30.May'08 at 11:38:20 +0800 -=
> Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading
> whilst viewing messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
So you want a threaded scored view or a scored threaded view?
Anyway, the best you can get is sort=threads, sort_aux
Hi all,
* I have mutt score every message that it reads.
* I then use the scores to sort my messages in order of importance (to me).
Problem: I loose my threading :(
Question: Is it possible to maintain the following threading whilst viewing
messages in "sorted by score" mode ?
folde
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date
> of newest message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key?
> If yes, how can I setup it?
> If no, this is a feature request. :)
Your version of mutt is o
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date of newest
> message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key? If yes, how can I
> setup it? If no, this is a feature request. :)
Set the below variables in ~/.muttrc.
Hello,
has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date
of newest message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key?
If yes, how can I setup it?
If no, this is a feature request. :)
Thanks.
--
Pavel
On 29 Feb 2008 17:00 +0100, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (wishi):
> Can I sort mailing lists into separate folders, too?
> - I found the list command... but it's not sorting my stuff at all.
>
> I. e. I'm on the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the subject is always [bar]. Is
> there
'm using mailing lists, and a key-feature of mutt, I think, is
> the thread sorting, that comes in very handy. (Really, thanks for
> this live-changing option! :))
>
> Can I sort mailing lists into separate folders, too?
> - I found the list command... but it's not sorti
Hi!
I'm going to use mutt as MUA... but I'm new here, and so I have got 3
questions. Hopefully, it's possible:
1. I'm using mailing lists, and a key-feature of mutt, I think, is the
thread sorting, that comes in very handy. (Really, thanks for this
live-changing opti
On Mon 10.Dec'07 at 15:37:00 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, December 10 at 09:15 PM, quoth Jamie Griffin:
> > Thanks Kyle
> >
> > i will look at procmail and see what i can so. Any ideas on where i
> > could find some more infor about using procmail with imap folders?
> > The stuff i've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, December 10 at 09:15 PM, quoth Jamie Griffin:
> Thanks Kyle
>
> i will look at procmail and see what i can so. Any ideas on where i
> could find some more infor about using procmail with imap folders?
> The stuff i've looked at seems mostl
On Mon 10.Dec'07 at 14:51:02 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, December 10 at 08:23 PM, quoth Jamie Griffin:
> > I don't use local folders currently and manage my mail using imap
> > folders.
>
> Cool, same here! I like being able to get access to all my email from
> virtually anywhere.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, December 10 at 08:23 PM, quoth Jamie Griffin:
> I don't use local folders currently and manage my mail using imap
> folders.
Cool, same here! I like being able to get access to all my email from
virtually anywhere.
> I thought about sett
Hi there -
I don't use local folders currently and manage my mail using imap folders. I
thought about setting up mailboxes
to receive and store items such as mail from mailing-lists.
I'm assuming i can get mutt to do this for me when the mail pulled down from
the server but from the resources
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:28:37PM +, Dave Evans wrote:
> > Now, if hdr_order was able to intepret lack of an argument as
> > "sort everything in alphabetical order"... Or perhaps a trailing
> > "*" as "sort any other headers in alphabetical order"...
>
> That would indeed be useful. Or regex
On 2007-10-19 22:28 +, Dave Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > Collecting the names of all the headers in either email, sorting
> > them and feeding them to hdr_order is as time-consuming as the
> > shell hackery I'm doi
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Collecting the names of all the headers in either email, sorting
> them and feeding them to hdr_order is as time-consuming as the
> shell hackery I'm doing now and it's more error-prone.
Yeah, but your config (lo
p you do
> the "spot the difference" for building procmail rules.
Collecting the names of all the headers in either email, sorting
them and feeding them to hdr_order is as time-consuming as the
shell hackery I'm doing now and it's more error-prone.
Now, if hdr_order was able t
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in
> case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer.
>
> It's something I regularly need when I'm looking for headers to
> distinguish between list posts and
k that's what you
meant by "message viewer", but in mutt it's referred to as the index
menu--and type o to change the sort order, followed by s to select
sorting by subject. It appears to be a case-insensitive sort.
HTH,
Gary
It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in
case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer.
It's something I regularly need when I'm looking for headers to
distinguish between list posts and list administrivia in my procmail
rules. It's sufficiently cumbersome to
Thank you Kyle the excellent explanation. This is a Gentoo forum type of
answer/explanation; friendly and in
details.
This kind of spirit encourage others to use the software.
This one will go into my help file collection.
I have replaced "%-15.15a" with "%-15.15n"
%n author's real name (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, September 30 at 10:34 PM, quoth Joseph:
>On 09/30/07 23:06, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 30 at 09:32 PM, quoth Joseph:
>> >I would like to solve two problems.
>> >
>> >1.) I have noticed on your mailing list when I hit the ind
>controlled by, is it by header or index display?
>
> index_format
So I have to dissect that crypto :-)
>
> >2.) Sorting index
> >I have settings:
> ># Folder Hooks
> >folder-hook . set sort=reverse-date-sent#default sort
> >
> >When I open mutt
9/23/07 01:13 Kyle Wheeler(2.2K)
> 4 09/23/07 02:40 Stefano Sabatin (3.0K)
>-
>
>The mail #2 is from me: "To [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and all other emails I see have
>the names in them, which variable it is
>controlled by, is it by header or index display?
ind
e="Joseph" # My real name, for the From line
set use_from=yes
set use_envelope_from=yes
2.) Sorting index
I have settings:
# Folder Hooks
folder-hook . set sort=reverse-date-sent#default sort
When I open mutt it displays latest message at the top and that is what I want.
However
On 25Sep2007 21:52, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tuesday, September 25 at 08:29 PM, quoth Joseph:
| >I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
| >mail.
| >Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
|
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-01-70 11:34]:
> Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
Yes, you can use procmail via hooks. Write a hook to pipe a copy of
your outgoing mail thru a *special* procmailrc containing recipies
reflecting your intent. The proc
> Procmail is a delivery agent; it only handles incoming mail.
> Automatically sorting outgoing mail (i.e. putting mail into different
> folders as it is sent) requires send-hooks.
While it's true that procmail can act as a delivery agent, it can also
filter any mail that you fee
> Procmail is a delivery agent; it only handles incoming mail.
Very true. Ergo, if you /want/ to use procmail to sort outgoing mail,
then make it also be incoming mail. Namely, you can BCC yourself, and
in your procmail recipes check to see if you are the sender.
One downside of doing this tho
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:29:00PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
> mail.
> Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
AFAIK, you'll need to use hooks. A good option is to save outgoing mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 25 at 08:29 PM, quoth Joseph:
>I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
>mail.
>Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
Procmail is a delivery agent; it onl
I know procmail is used to sort an incoming mail but what about outgoing
mail.
Can I use procmail for sorting outgoing mail or I need to use hooks?
--
#Joseph
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-16-07 23:38]:
> Thanks for the advise. In fact I've read most part of the manual.
> Just not sure if this is it.
Well, you are free to try different configurations to see what works
best for you.
ps, no need to fully quote previous messages, especiall
>threads
>to
>
>You may optionally use the reverse- prefix to specify reverse
>sorting order (example: set sort=reverse-date-sent).
>
>
> 3.285. sort_aux
>
>Type: sor
am
subject
threads
to
You may optionally use the reverse- prefix to specify reverse
sorting order (example: set sort=reverse-date-sent).
3.285. sort_aux
Type: sort order
Default: date
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > I'm wondering whether mutt can use multiple sorting methods. I know
> > there are `sort' and `sort_aux', but what if I need t
* On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I'm wondering whether mutt can use multiple sorting methods. I know
> there are `sort' and `sort_aux', but what if I need to, for example,
> sort mails by score, and for those mails who have the sa
Hello list!
I'm wondering whether mutt can use multiple sorting methods. I know
there are `sort' and `sort_aux', but what if I need to, for example,
sort mails by score, and for those mails who have the same score, sort
them by date-sent?
--
There is no emotion; there is pea
7;d prefer this?
set sort = reverse-threads
set sort_aux = date-received
There are other sorting options as well, check the docs:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html
HTH,
-chris
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Fred told:
> Hi,
>
> Using $sort, $sort_aux, $sort_browsing (that's what Ive tried) I
> would like to sort my mails by threads so that when a new mail
> which belongs to a previous thread, arrives, mutt moves the
> freshly updated thread at the top of
Hi,
Using $sort, $sort_aux, $sort_browsing (that's what Ive tried) I would
like to sort my mails by threads so that when a new mail which belongs
to a previous thread, arrives, mutt moves the freshly updated thread
at the top of the index.
Currently, the mail is just put in a thread, and I have t
V" didn't work
any more (thanks to both of you for that tip!). Apparently mutt stops
processing folder hooks when an error is encountered, thus it
short-circuited the sorting by subject for the SA folder.
I just fixed it by prepending the spam rule with "junk/.*" since it is
a
On 07/12/02 22:53 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
>
> I notice some really odd behavior in mutt. I have it set up with some
> folder-hooks to sort by threads in all my mailing list folders. This
> works fine, _except_ for one particular list *iff* I don't have the
> line
> folder-hook l
Derrick 'dman' Hudson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> folder-hook lists.* "" # collapse all threads
>
> The other problem is that line causes a " command not
> found" message, and doesn't actually do anything
folder-hook lists push \eV
HTH,
Michael
--
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is ove
I notice some really odd behavior in mutt. I have it set up with some
folder-hooks to sort by threads in all my mailing list folders. This
works fine, _except_ for one particular list *iff* I don't have the
line
folder-hook lists.* "" # collapse all threads
in my .muttrc. (remove that line
I have sort set to thread and sort_aux to score. Is there a way I can
get a third sorting method to sort everything of the same score that's
not part of a thread by date?
--
/*
* Bob Phan <[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Computational Chemistry Informatics
* Neurogen
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:11:40AM -0700, Peter Gelbman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> > I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> > However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> > it was received. In ot
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> it was received. In other words, if a user has the wrong time or date
> on their machine, it
> Is there a way to have mutt sort it by the date received instead of
> the date sender marks it with?
Sure is:
Sort (d)ate/(f)rm/(r)ecv/(s)ubj/t(o)/(t)hread/(u)nsort/si(z)e/s(c)ore?:
^^
--
Mike Schiraldi
VeriSign Applied Research
msg28925/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
You want to sort by (r)ecv (that is, date RECeiVed),
rather than sort by (d)ate, which sorts by the Date: header.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not
I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
it was received. In other words, if a user has the wrong time or date
on their machine, it will get reflected in my mailbox when mutt sorts
it. Other IMAP clie
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:03:19PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 14:00]:
> > Hello again,
> > I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt.
> > I currently have sort=threads. I thought tha
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 14:00]:
> Hello again,
> I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt.
> I currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads,
> and then by date. For example, some of my folder have n
Hello again,
I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt. I
currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads, and
then by date. For example, some of my folder have no threads at all,
and I'd like those sorted by date (received). Below is the
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
