Re: Can I set Return-Path: somehow in a message?

2010-03-05 Thread Chris G
you send a messages to an unsubscribe > > address and then a confirmation. The trouble is that it insists on > > using my Return-Path: rather than either the From: or Reply-To: > > address so I can't get it to unsibscribe c...@isbd.net. > > > > Is there any way that

Re: Can I set Return-Path: somehow in a message?

2010-03-05 Thread Christoph Ludwig
mailing list mail to another delivery address if I need to. > > However I have a problem with one mailing list I'm trying to > unsubscribe from, it's one where you send a messages to an unsubscribe > address and then a confirmation. The trouble is that it insists on > usi

Can I set Return-Path: somehow in a message?

2010-03-05 Thread Chris G
problem with one mailing list I'm trying to unsubscribe from, it's one where you send a messages to an unsubscribe address and then a confirmation. The trouble is that it insists on using my Return-Path: rather than either the From: or Reply-To: address so I can't get it to unsibscrib

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Moolman
Excellent, thank you very much Kyle. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Wheeler Sent: 17 April 2008 02:52 PM To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Return-Path problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 17

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Steve S
> Ok, now another newbie question, I am just trying to understand what I > just did. The manual says: > > 3.291. use_envelope_from > > Type: boolean > Default: no > > "When set, mutt will set the envelope sender of the message. If > ``$envelope_from_address'' is set, it will be used as the send

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 17 at 12:41 PM, quoth Dirk Moolman: > just did. The manual says: > > 3.291. use_envelope_from > > Type: boolean > Default: no > > "When set, mutt will set the envelope sender of the message. If > ``$envelope_from_address'' is set,

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Moolman
>-Original Message- >From: Kirill Miazine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 17 April 2008 10:00 AM >To: Dirk Moolman >Cc: mutt-users@mutt.org >Subject: Re: Return-Path problem > >* Dirk Moolman [2008-04-17 09:39]: >>>>When I open the header of the e-m

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Miazine
* Dirk Moolman [2008-04-17 09:39]: When I open the header of the e-mail received, the return-path of the mail is different from the From: part of the mail. The return-path is always set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I change this, so that it reflects the same address that is in the From: part

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Moolman
-Original Message- From: Kirill Miazine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 April 2008 09:09 AM >* Dirk Moolman [2008-04-17 08:53]: >[...] >>When I open the header of the e-mail received, the return-path of the >>mail is different from the From: part of the mail.

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Miazine
* Dirk Moolman [2008-04-17 08:53]: [...] When I open the header of the e-mail received, the return-path of the mail is different from the From: part of the mail. The return-path is always set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I change this, so that it reflects the same address that is in the From

Return-Path problem

2008-04-16 Thread Dirk Moolman
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem: When I open the header of the e-mail received, the return-path of the mail is different from the From: part of the mail. The return-path is always set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I change this, so that it reflects the same

Re: Return-Path: header

2002-04-04 Thread EC
--- Alexander Wasmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any way I can get Mutt to send the desired "Return-Path" header? > > | 6.3.43. envelope_from > | > | Type: boolean > | Default: no > > so "set envelop_from=yes"

Re: Return-Path: header

2002-04-04 Thread Alexander Wasmuth
EC wrote: > The problem is that when I use mutt, the Return-Path header is sent with my > dummy domain name, which causes certain (not all) SMTP servers to not deliver > my message since the domain is unresolvable. When I use other mail clients > (Pine, Eudora, Mail in MacOSX), t

Return-Path: header

2002-04-04 Thread EC
CP purposes. The problem is that when I use mutt, the Return-Path header is sent with my dummy domain name, which causes certain (not all) SMTP servers to not deliver my message since the domain is unresolvable. When I use other mail clients (Pine, Eudora, Mail in MacOSX), the header is sent with

Re: set return-path?

2001-03-28 Thread Wade A. Mosely
Zach Thompson wrote: > I notice that the Return-Path header it set to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > which is me at my workstation. I have the reply-to and from header set to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I think that the mailing list program at mysql > is trying to use the bertha address... I h

set return-path?

2001-03-28 Thread Zach Thompson
I'm having trouble subscribing to certain mailing lists (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), and I think it's because I send mail from a different host that I receive mail (my imap server). Can anyone, by looking at the headers of this message, tell me what my problem is? I notice that the R

Re: Writing Return-Path

2000-08-08 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:11:05PM +1000, Rob Watkin wrote: > I don't want the recipient to ever know the actual Linux account name which > actually handled the mail but the recipient gets this: > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is there any way to alter this fie

Writing Return-Path

2000-08-08 Thread Rob Watkin
gt; I am able to change the From field. The Problem. I don't want the recipient to ever know the actual Linux account name which actually handled the mail but the recipient gets this: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is there any way to alter this field in .muttrc? Should I be

Return-Path

1999-07-30 Thread Niels Rasmussen
Giving up on 212.54.64.155. > > --- Below this line is the original bounce. >