On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:30:38AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> combining all 3 ideas that were posted to this list, i have:
>
> macro pager \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n"
>
> there are still two problems:
>
> 1. when forwarding (as opposed to bouncing), mutt places me in
> an edit
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 10. 2001 16:13]:
> However, in any *other* email I reply to, which is not addressed to
> spamcop, I get the Fcc: /dev/null header. (See my headers)
Duh, and of course Fcc is handled locally. *Smacks himself*
--
-Brian Clark
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 10. 2001 14:49]:
> % there are still two problems:
> %
> % 1. when forwarding (as opposed to bouncing), mutt places me in
> % an editor (vim). is there a way to tell mutt to ixnay the
> % editing here?
>
> Piece of cake:
>
> send-hook . "set e
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:30:38AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> combining all 3 ideas that were posted to this list, i have:
>
> macro pager \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n"
>
> there are still two problems:
>
> 1. when forwarding (as opposed to bouncing), mutt places me in
> an edit
Peter --
...and then Peter Jay Salzman said...
%
% combining all 3 ideas that were posted to this list, i have:
%
% macro pager \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n"
%
% there are still two problems:
%
% 1. when forwarding (as opposed to bouncing), mutt places me in
% an editor (vim). is t
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:30:38 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: spamcop forwarding redux
> From: Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> combining all 3 ideas that were posted to this list, i have:
>
> macro pager \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n"
>
> there are still two problems:
