On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:08:32PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Suresh, et al --
>
> ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
> % Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
> %
> % > However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
> % > *only* one in the folder then mu
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:29:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
>
> > However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
> > *only* one in the folder then mutt gives an error "No messages matched
> > criteria." and does
Suresh, et al --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
%
% > However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
% > *only* one in the folder then mutt gives an error "No messages matched
% > criteria." and doesn't remove
Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
> However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
> *only* one in the folder then mutt gives an error "No messages matched
> criteria." and doesn't remove the message from the index display.
If mutt is the only thing you use
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:24:21AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 August 2000 at 06:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:27:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > > Turns out you also can use:
> > > push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> > > or, I guess,
> > > push "l! ~h X-
On Tuesday, 15 August 2000 at 06:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:27:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Turns out you also can use:
> > push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> > or, I guess,
> > push "l! ~h X-IMAP:\n"
> >
> > I can't guess how much slower that might be, if any,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:38:14PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, David Champion whacked out:
>
> > Turns out you also can use:
> > push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> > or, I guess,
> > push "l! ~h X-IMAP:\n"
>
> > I can't guess how much slower that might be, if any, bu
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:27:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> On 2000.08.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > push "l!~s '^DON'\\''T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA$'^M"
> >
> > This (I hope) anchors the string at both end
Using a large mallet, David Champion whacked out:
> Turns out you also can use:
> push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> or, I guess,
> push "l! ~h X-IMAP:\n"
> I can't guess how much slower that might be, if any, but it's surely
> simpler.
That works out in the wu-imapd ... and in any case, isn't
On 2000.08.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> push "l!~s '^DON'\\''T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA$'^M"
>
> This (I hope) anchors the string at both ends so that only messages
> with this exact subject will be matched so messa
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 06:41:59PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Aug 2000:
> > push l ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
> >
> > but, at startup, mutt just says:-
> > Error in /usr/home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 96: push: too many arguments
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Aug 2000:
> push l ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
> but, at startup, mutt just says:-
> Error in /usr/home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 96: push: too many arguments
>
> What am I doing wrong? I guess it's something to do with the '!' and
> t
12 matches
Mail list logo
