Re: procmail rules

2000-05-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: > You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders > after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the > mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder, > but mutt doesn't know that the

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-30 Thread Lars Hecking
> Indeed. Didn't we already go over this on the mutt-dev list and > come up with the specs for the way the lists handling *should* work? Yep. I was just too lazy to dig out the references ... > It's just that nobody's done it yet. ;-) > > (Hmm, maybe you're not on mutt-dev...) You should

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders > after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the > mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder, > but mutt doe

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-30 Thread Lars Hecking
Suresh Ramasubramanian writes: > Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >>I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each > >> mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: > >> > >> :0: > >> * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> IN.mutt-users > > >

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each >> mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: >> >> :0: >> * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> IN.mutt-users > While this can be solved, as others have shown, it

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-29 Thread Lars Hecking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each > mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: > > :0: > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > IN.mutt-users > > However, when someone sends a message TO: the list with a CC: to me, > or the opposite, both c

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-29 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
You, [EMAIL PROTECTED], were spotted writing this on Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:51:56PM -0300: > I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each > mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: > > :0: > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > IN.mutt-users > > However, when someone sends

Re: procmail rules

2000-05-29 Thread Mipam
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:51:56PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each > mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: > > :0: > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > IN.mutt-users > > However, when someone sends a message TO: the list wi