Hello,
> This implies I'm a Mutt developer, which I'm not. :-)
Oops... I really thought so.
> But someone who has the patch on their
> HD might actually be better suited to this. :-)
In that case I might just as well try my luck. Although David just "levelled"
things. :)
Cheers,
Manuel
Mikko, et al --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 02 Aug 2000:
% > I guess that now there isn't any longer a need to inform all the
% > hard-working men and women :) at mutt-dev about this, since Mikko will
% > spread it around. :)
%
% This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 02 Aug 2000:
> I guess that now there isn't any longer a need to inform all the
> hard-working men and women :) at mutt-dev about this, since Mikko will
> spread it around. :)
This implies I'm a Mutt developer, which I'm not. :-) I actually
alr
Hello everyone,
So, it seems that, as Mikko put it in his previous email, we are pretty much
done with this issue, right?
I guess that now there isn't any longer a need to inform all the
hard-working men and women :) at mutt-dev about this, since Mikko will
spread it around. :)
I am glad to kno
Using a large mallet, Mikko H?nninen whacked out:
> Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 01 Aug 2000:
> > I have a similair problem -- bounced messages are lost and never reach
> > the destination.
> Some mail server looks at the envelope sender or something and just
> discards th
Hi,
You guys seem to have already finished the thread and come up with a
patch, so maybe it's useless for me to add my comments now, but I'll
do so anyway. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 01 Aug 2000:
> So I guess that since when I bounce a message the "From: " field does
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 01:25:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Maybe something like this would help: this should make envelope from same as
> > the added Resent-From: header. The patch is against 1.2.4 and completely
> > untested.
>
> [...]
>
> I'll recompile mutt this afternoon and let
Suresh -
> > Another problem with solving this at MTA level (namely with some sort of
> > address rewriting) is that I only have one user account at my computer, but
>
> Then the only idea I can offer you is to create multiple usernames on your
> computer ;)
Right :)
I also asked Marius abou
Marius -
> > > [...] (I think... what would sendmail do if it got
> > > two -f options?),
>
> I've checked -- sendmail barfs if it gets -f twice.
Yep, also tried it... and the manual also said not even to try... :)
> Maybe something like this would help: this should make envelope from same as
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 12:41:45AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > These solutions are not perfect, as they
> > override $envelope_from (I think... what would sendmail do if it got
> > two -f options?),
I've checked -- sendmail barfs if it gets -f twice.
[...]
> But I just tested it and it s
Using a large mallet, Suresh Ramasubramanian whacked out:
> Or downgrade to a lower version of mutt which doesn't do this ...
> 1.2.4 doesn't have this problem afaict.
I spoke too soon :( Tried it (use procmail as my mda - mda /usr/bin/procmail
-d mallet in my .fetchmailrc
Here are some sampl
Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
> Another problem with solving this at MTA level (namely with some sort of
> address rewriting) is that I only have one user account at my computer, but
Then the only idea I can offer you is to create multiple usernames on your
computer ;)
Or
Hi Marius,
> > Can you tell me why this happens?
>
> I think I can. I've set $sendmail to a wrapper script and noticed, that
> the "-f user@host" is not added when bouncing a message, despite
> $envelope_from being turned on.
Exactly. In my last email to the list I also mentioned that I am
Hi Suresh,
Thank you for your reply.
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) shows up in the header and confuses my ISP's
> > server. If this is the problem, how can I overcome it?
>
> Hmmm... you are using Postfix locally and I don't grok postfix - but sendmail
> can be set to masquerade as a domain (setti
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 04:33:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have come across a minor problem with mutt-1.2.5: when I bounce
> a message, my ISP's SMTP server always refuses to accept it.
I have a similair problem -- bounced messages are lost and never reach
the destination.
Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
> but perhaps this doesn't work with bounced emails and my local address
There is no reason why it should not work - it works perfectly well with 1.2.4
(and with 1.3 which I used to use earlier).
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) show up in the header a
16 matches
Mail list logo
