Re: pop support

1999-04-05 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 07:45:37AM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > Sure, I just wondered if the mail that is fetched from the pop host wanders > through sendmail or is directly put into some folder. Ah, very different Q - it's put directly in the main mail folder. -- Later ... Rich Roth ---

Re: pop support

1999-04-05 Thread Christian R Molls
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > > > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? > > I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with > forwarding or, for

Re: pop support

1999-04-04 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 21:11 -0500 03 Apr 1999, James FitzGibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stuff about sending mail with POP3. > I think the command is XSENDER (and perhaps others, I think this one is > logically equivalent to SMTP's "MAIL FROM". AFAIK, it's never been in an > RFC or draft. I've never seen a cli

Re: pop support

1999-04-03 Thread James FitzGibbon
* rfi from Rich Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990403 17:02]: > > Actually, there is some sort of POP magic that can be used to send mail > > via the POP daemon. I don't know how widely supported it is. I suppose > > Never heard of it - Sounds like some nifty idea the spec writer threw in > that no

Re: pop support

1999-04-03 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 03:36:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > Actually, there is some sort of POP magic that can be used to send mail > via the POP daemon. I don't know how widely supported it is. I suppose Never heard of it - Sounds like some nifty idea the spec writer threw in that no one ha

Re: pop support

1999-04-01 Thread David Shaw
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 03:36:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 06:57:50PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > > > > > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? > > > > I

Re: pop support

1999-04-01 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 06:57:50PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > > > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? > > I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with >

Re: pop support

1999-04-01 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 06:57:50PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > > > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? > > I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with >

Re: pop support

1999-03-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-03-30 23:48:02 +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via > port 25? Mutt's internal pop support doesn't forward mail at all. Mutt is able to write mail folders itself, and it's pop support is actually using this capability. Gene

Re: pop support

1999-03-30 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with forwarding or, for that matter, sending email - and Mutt, does use a MTA (like