On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 03:36:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 06:57:50PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote:
> >
> > > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25?
> >
> > I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with
> > forwarding or, for that matter, sending email - and Mutt, does use a MTA
> > (like sendmail) to send mail.
>
> Actually, there is some sort of POP magic that can be used to send mail
> via the POP daemon. I don't know how widely supported it is. I suppose
> someone could write a MTA that mutt could use to send mail via that
> method, but there seems to be very little point unless you are in a
> situation that can't use a SMTP agent.
Pardon for the double post. Itchy trigger finger..
David
--
David Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
