On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 08:41:22PM +0200, Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mutt 1.4 has wonderfull code for threading: powerfull, versatile,
> fast, configurable to everyone's taste, informative (I mean the "&?"
> missing and the "*" broken). But a little bit fragile: Perhaps too much
On 2002-06-13, Alain Bench wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> On Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 10:23:01 AM +0300, Christoph Bugel wrote:
>
> > I found that my local mbox files contain lots of headers of the form
> > In-reply-to: <"from userxyz"@host>
>
> Do you have an MTA called "iPlanet Messagin
Hello Christoph,
On Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 10:23:01 AM +0300, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> I found that my local mbox files contain lots of headers of the form
> In-reply-to: <"from userxyz"@host>
Do you have an MTA called "iPlanet Messaging Server" in the path
between the list robot and y
On 2002-06-13, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Christoph Bugel [02-06-13 09:29:54 +0200] wrote:
> > On 2002-06-12, Alain Bench wrote:
>
> > > set in_reply_to="%i"
>
> > I still don't understand what's going on though. I even
> > suspect that it's not the default $in_reply_to from
> > mutt-1.2.5
Hi,
* Christoph Bugel [02-06-13 09:29:54 +0200] wrote:
> On 2002-06-12, Alain Bench wrote:
> > set in_reply_to="%i"
> I still don't understand what's going on though. I even
> suspect that it's not the default $in_reply_to from
> mutt-1.2.5 that confuses mutt-1.4. I found that my local
> mbox
On 2002-06-12, Alain Bench wrote:
[...]
> Calm down! ;-) Situation is not *so* critical:
ok ;-)
> First: many readers use more "References:" than "In-Reply-To:" to
> show threads, and Mutt 1.2.5 posts this field cleanly.
>
> Second: trash loaded IRT field is not a problem of Mutt 1.
Hello Christoph,
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002 at 2:08:17 PM +0300, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> mutt-1.2.5 users break threading for everyone else on a mailing list!
> They should stop doing so immediately!
Calm down! ;-) Situation is not *so* critical:
First: many readers use more "Refere
Hi,
* Christoph Bugel [02-06-12 16:34:28 +0200] wrote:
> So I guess the conclusion is:
> mutt-1.2.5 users break threading for everyone else on a mailing
> list! They should stop doing so immediately!
No. Because it's mutt we're talking about:
,[ ~/docs/software/mutt/manual-1.2.5.1.txt ]-
* Christoph Bugel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-12]:
>
>
> > And the difference between In-Reply-To and References is
> > also trivial for the case that you reply to multiple
> > messages at once: it can't be handled within References
>
> hmm, I never understood the concept of replying to multip
