On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:46:46AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:15:37AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > Will Yardley wrote:
> > > However, I'm having a problem similar to the one described here:
> > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/52889
> > Thi
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:15:37AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> Will Yardley wrote:
> > However, I'm having a problem similar to the one described here:
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/52889
> >
> > namely, if I don't set $GPG_AGENT_INFO, mutt complains t
Hi Will,
Will Yardley wrote:
> However, I'm having a problem similar to the one described here:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/52889
>
> namely, if I don't set $GPG_AGENT_INFO, mutt complains that gpg-agent
> isn't running on startup. Does anyone know whether having it defi
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:34:20PM +0100, miroslav.rov...@zg.ht.hr wrote:
> Read there and in the links to the Gentoo Forums topic therefrom.
> They want to bind the use of gpg, from gpg2 it is a must, to the gpgme
> library, which is completely unnecessary, IMO, for simple workstation
> (the most
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:13:37PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> I've been having some problems since switching from gpg to gpg2 (I had
> installed gnupg2 earlier, but a dependency had reinstalled gpg1 into the
> 'gpg' slot).
>
> I keep getting:
> "gpg: decryption failed: No secret key"
> even thou
