On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:34:20PM +0100, miroslav.rov...@zg.ht.hr wrote: > Read there and in the links to the Gentoo Forums topic therefrom. > They want to bind the use of gpg, from gpg2 it is a must, to the gpgme > library, which is completely unnecessary, IMO, for simple workstation > (the most of users), but I'm not an expert...
I don't mind using gpgme, in fact, I kind of get why it's being done this way. However, I'm having a problem similar to the one described here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/52889 namely, if I don't set $GPG_AGENT_INFO, mutt complains that gpg-agent isn't running on startup. Does anyone know whether having it defined is required, since some of the comments in the post above seem to imply it shouldn't be. Additionally, pinentry-curses doesn't seem to play nice with mutt so far, but I'll keep playing with it. w
