> Does it make messages that PGP 2.6 can read? I think that is the issue.
> As I think I may have posted before, there is a patch somewhere on the
> gpg-dev list archive to make this possible, but it isn't trivial due to
> the fact that PGP 2.6 relies on tempfiles whereas GPG uses pipes, so GPG
>
On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> > management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
> > sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
> > Gero
>
> To get GnuP
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
> sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
> Gero
To get GnuPG to sign and encrypt at the same time is in the gpg --help page
and the ma
