Re: [Evolution] Archive function?

2002-09-18 Thread PeterKorman
Lotus Notes does archives too. As long as you dont mind spending 90 seconds to start your mail client and having it occupy 96 megs of RAM. Itz a very heavy client. [JPK] On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:46:05PM -0400, Gil Hauer wrote: > Outlook does indeed allow the user to archive old email based o

Re: Evolution alias import?

2002-02-21 Thread Martin Karlsson
On Thu Feb 21, 2002 at 01:27:28PM +0200, Radek Spacil wrote: > If there will not be vCard, maybe there will be different one > to which Evolution is able to export... There is a 'vcard2abook' perl script which I /believe/ comes with abook (in contrib/ in the tarball). It's attached below in case

Re: Evolution alias import?

2002-02-21 Thread Radek Spacil
On 19/02/02 20:46, Jonathan Watterson wrote: > Thing is, I've got some contacts listed with Evolution. Is there an easy > way to translate these contacts to Mutt's alias file, or will I need to > start over? Evolution's contact list seems to be in "vcard" format. I'm not sure if this will help,

Re: Evolution alias import?

2002-02-20 Thread Simon White
Your best bet might be to check what options for export you have in Evolution, since vCard format contains a whole load of other data, and your Mutt aliases will have to be nickname, name and email address so you won't be able to use files in vCard format. -- |-Simon White |-Internet Services Man

Re: evolution

2002-01-07 Thread Will Yardley
David Rock wrote: > > understand, Evolution has an Exchange connector piece that you can > purchase, but I really want nothing to do with Evolution if I can help > it (although *anything* is better than Lookout). one interesting thing is that evolution DOES use PGP/Mime for encryption... while i

Re: evolution

2002-01-07 Thread David Rock
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:31:35AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > Hey people. > > I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution > because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$ > Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more > like a

Re: evolution

2002-01-07 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 07/01/02 Nick Wilson did speaketh: > * Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 17:44]: > > Sheesh I just came from kmail! > Like most things Unix-ish there's a fair old learning curve, but sooo > worth it! Yup. Most things worth anything are worth learning. Mike -- Michael P.

Re: evolution

2002-01-07 Thread Nick Wilson
* Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 17:44]: > > Hey people. > > I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution > because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$ > Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more > like a step backwa