On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > Probably it won't help you too much if you don't have influence on the
> > admins, but the latest UofW imap (to be released very soon) does not
> > use this technique a
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > Probably it won't help you too much if you don't have influence on the
> > admins, but the latest UofW imap (to be released very soon) does not
> > use this technique a
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Probably it won't help you too much if you don't have influence on the
> admins, but the latest UofW imap (to be released very soon) does not
> use this technique any longer...
Is there any other cute imap server for linux? I'm pla
On 2000.07.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sunil Shetye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > push ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
> Then, this series of mails will also get ignored:-)
So
push ! (~s 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE' ~f MAILER-DAEMON@)
(more or less).
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:14:04AM -0500:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:19:05PM +0530, Sunil Shetye wrote:
> > Quoting from David T-G's mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400:
> > > % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> >
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:19:05PM +0530, Sunil Shetye wrote:
> Quoting from David T-G's mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400:
> > % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> > % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
>
> In fact, this problem
Sunil, et al --
...and then Sunil Shetye said...
% Quoting from David T-G's mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400:
% > % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
% > % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
%
% In fact, this problem should not
Quoting from David T-G's mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400:
> % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
In fact, this problem should not occur at all as imap servers do no
pass this message as a ne
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
>
> I think the closest thing was to either push a limit like
>
> push ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
That
Chris --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% I know this came up a while ago but I wasn't using a UW IMAP server
% then. I have found that one of my free shell accounts is running this
% IMAP server and I'd like to use it.
"... and then they came to take me away, and there was nobody left t
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:44:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know this came up a while ago but I wasn't using a UW IMAP server
> then. I have found that one of my free shell accounts is running this
> IMAP server and I'd like to use it.
>
> So, did anyone come up with a strategy for ge
11 matches
Mail list logo
