Manoj Kasichainula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> > filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> > I'm using IMAP mail, which
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there any
> way to ge
[I'm CCing this to HJ to see if he can send me the other patches he
mentioned]
I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I read via IMAP from multiple machines, so no fetchmail/procmail combo works]
> The rest of the office is using Outlook with PGP
> support, but that sends old-style PGP bodies and sets the
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will handle
> this quite nicely.
Fetchmail will pull the mail from the IMAP server and, presumably, store
it locally on your workstation. That's pretty much what it's for,
anyway.
When using a
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
> handle this quite nicely.
I read mail on more than one machine. I can have fetchmail leave the
mail on the server, but then it doesn't get deleted from the server when
I delete it.
Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
handle this quite nicely.
Josh
> G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> > any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures
G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures on
> this mail?
I guess I'm kinda lucky, in that I have login access on the server where
my mail gets stored, so
