On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Yeah, I've been trying to explain this to some folks around here
> > recently, but not having much success. You have my sympathy.
>
> Agreed. It is frustrating. But Derek, please don't give up!
I gave up a LOOONG time ago. Like
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> A couple more ideas:
>
> 'maildrop' comes with some nice tools for working with mail in
> scripts. (It's also a rather good filtering / routing / piping /
> you-name-it MDA.)
Maildrop is awesome and so much better than procmail.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
>
> We are a small company ahd IT is only one of his many jobss along
> with facilities, planning, project management and others. He got IT
> because nobody else was willing to do it. The explanation I got for
> not embracing an integr
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> On 2020-04-28 00:20,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've since written a filter to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:20:16AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
I wonder if you could just forward that sanitized block to yourself
as plain-text ... then mutt should deal with it just fine?
I tried that and Mutt forwards the original
On 2020-04-28 00:20,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > > extra formatting before passing
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've given up politely asking
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:57PM -0600, Akkana Peck wrote:
>
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > > > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > > > to me. I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
> > out of w3m is now properl
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> > Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> > guy refuse
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > > to me. It's a losing battle. :(
Since I don't have to deal with PGP, increasing
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > to me. It's a losing battl
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted ema
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
> > however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check the
> > processed output because n
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check the
processed output because no sane person would wrap a PGP block in
HTML!
Yes, sorry that's right. Mutt
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jens John wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> > handle encypted emails.
>
> Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and
> sign
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:13:59AM +0100, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> On 2020-04-26 08:04,
> Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> > On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> > David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
> > Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> > perh
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> handle encypted emails.
Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and
signing with S/MIME. Perhaps your IT guy would be more open to just
using a
On 2020-04-26 08:04,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> perhaps piping the -dumped text through cat -s or --squeeze-blank
> might work - e.g.
On 2020-04-25 21:46,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted emai
20 matches
Mail list logo
