On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:12:54PM -0900, Roger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:53:22PM +, Chris G wrote:
> >(e)ncrypt - presumably encrypts the message and, when it asks "Enter
> >keyID for x...@yyy.zzz: " one enters the keyID for the *recipient*.
> >This had me fooled initiall
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:53:22PM +, Chris G wrote:
>(e)ncrypt - presumably encrypts the message and, when it asks "Enter
>keyID for x...@yyy.zzz: " one enters the keyID for the *recipient*.
>This had me fooled initially, I guess it's obvious when you think
>about it but not st
I have configured PGP with mutt (1.5.20 running on Xubuntu 10.04)
according to the instructions at:-
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG
It seems to be basically working but I have some questions about
actually using it. I'm not doing any automatic signing or encryption, I
only want to us
Will Yardley wrote:
> also when trying to get pgp stuff setup, i keep getting this error when
> using the default pgp2.rc file:
> No translations available for language "mutt"
sent this to the wrong address earlier... hoped it wouldn't go through.
i figured it out after reading tfm.
w
--
Sint
also when trying to get pgp stuff setup, i keep getting this error when
using the default pgp2.rc file:
No translations available for language "mutt"
and when sending messages to myself (after adding +encrypttoself to the
two relevant lines mentioned in the comment) i get these errors:
[-- PGP o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Since you're using gpg.rc, just make sure that pgp_clearsign_command
> (see 6.3.120) is set correctly and then set pgp_create_traditional
> (see 6.3.115) and you're off (but we'll all h
Emre --
...and then emre said...
% Hi,
%
% I'm using mutt-1.2.5i with the gpg.rc stuff in my ~/.muttrc. My
% question is:
% Is there a way to make mutt not attach PGP signed/encrypted files?
Yes.
% My old MUA would insert the signed text right into the message
% with the "BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Hi,
I'm using mutt-1.2.5i with the gpg.rc stuff in my ~/.muttrc. My
question is:
Is there a way to make mutt not attach PGP signed/encrypted files?
My old MUA would insert the signed text right into the message
with the "BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSSAGE" header etc same thing when I
encrypted somethi
Manoj Kasichainula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> > filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> > I'm using IMAP mail, which
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there any
> way to ge
(Mutt 1.0pre2, pgp 5 on what's basically Red Hat Linux 6.0 with some
security updates)
1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
[I'm CCing this to HJ to see if he can send me the other patches he
mentioned]
I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I read via IMAP from multiple machines, so no fetchmail/procmail combo works]
> The rest of the office is using Outlook with PGP
> support, but that sends old-style PGP bodies and sets the
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will handle
> this quite nicely.
Fetchmail will pull the mail from the IMAP server and, presumably, store
it locally on your workstation. That's pretty much what it's for,
anyway.
When using a
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
> handle this quite nicely.
I read mail on more than one machine. I can have fetchmail leave the
mail on the server, but then it doesn't get deleted from the server when
I delete it.
Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
handle this quite nicely.
Josh
> G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> > any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures
G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures on
> this mail?
I guess I'm kinda lucky, in that I have login access on the server where
my mail gets stored, so
16 matches
Mail list logo
