On 02Feb2018 04:13, Claus Assmann wrote:
Is there some fast way to save the attachments from multiple messages?
That is, without going to every individual message, viewing and
then saving the attachments? I can tag the attachments in a single
message and save them easily, but seemingly not for
Is there some fast way to save the attachments from multiple messages?
That is, without going to every individual message, viewing and
then saving the attachments? I can tag the attachments in a single
message and save them easily, but seemingly not for multiple messages
(AFAICT). Something like a
Le 20-01-2018, à 14:35:03 +0100, Simon Ruderich a écrit :
Note that this will add in-reply-to headers which you might not
expect if you want to create a new message.
Right. But it's that of a hassle to modify the headers. Including text
is much more.
Have a nice Sunday,
Steve
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:11:44PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 17-01-2018, à 16:42:53 -0800, Claus Assmann a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, steve wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to tag some messages
>>> with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message.
>>
>> Did you try "reply"? ;r
>
> Stupidly (o
Le 17-01-2018, à 16:42:53 -0800, Claus Assmann a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, steve wrote:
I tried to tag some messages
with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message.
Did you try "reply"? ;r
Stupidly (or so), I didn't…
And it does exactly what I wanted. Thank you.
And thank
steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to create a new message containing quotations of others
> messages (in order to avoid copy-pasting). I tried to tag some messages
> with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message. I've searched
> the web with many different key words but failed to find
On 17.01.18 11:43, steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to create a new message containing quotations of others
> messages (in order to avoid copy-pasting). I tried to tag some messages
> with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message. I've searched
> the web with many different key words
or;f
Andreas
On 17.01.18 16:42, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, steve wrote:
>
> > I tried to tag some messages
> > with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message.
>
> Did you try "reply"? ;r
--
Andreas Müller - Raum: 35/114b - Tel: 2875
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, steve wrote:
> I tried to tag some messages
> with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message.
Did you try "reply"? ;r
Hi Steve,
try ;r
and rewrite the To: field
Andreas
On 17.01.18 11:43, steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to create a new message containing quotations of others
> messages (in order to avoid copy-pasting). I tried to tag some messages
> with T then type ;m but this create an empty new
Hi,
I would like to create a new message containing quotations of others
messages (in order to avoid copy-pasting). I tried to tag some messages
with T then type ;m but this create an empty new message. I've searched
the web with many different key words but failed to find a solution.
Help would
I made an enhanced version of editlabel available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/editxlabel/
It handles tag-prefix but it still edits messages one at a
time. However, I added a history mechanism so that adding the same
labels to multiple files is relatively easy.
Regards,
Luis
On Tue, Apr
On 02Apr2012 11:00, Jostein Gogstad wrote:
| I stumbled upon editlabel [1] for editing labels (actually the X-Label header)
| with mutt. It sets the editor variable to a bash script, calls and then
| sets the variable back to vim.
|
| Unfortunately, this only works on a single message. I'd like
Hi,
I stumbled upon editlabel [1] for editing labels (actually the X-Label header)
with mutt. It sets the editor variable to a bash script, calls and then
sets the variable back to vim.
Unfortunately, this only works on a single message. I'd like to tag N messages
and then send all of them to a
Rocco Rutte wrote:
>> is there a way to mime-forward multiple messages?
>
> Yes, though you can't do it with issueing a forward. You first create your
> message as usual and, when in the compose menu, use
> function (default bound to 'A' IIRC) to attach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, June 12 at 03:21 PM, quoth Russell Hoover:
>> Just thought I would point out... You can compress that into a
>> single macro by putting a comma between index and pager::
>>
>> macro index,pager F "set
>> mime_forward=yes"
>
> Wow. This
On Mon 06/09/08 at 09:37 AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought I would point out... You can compress that into a single
> macro by putting a comma between index and pager::
>
> macro index,pager F "set
> mime_forward=yes"
Wow. This significantly reduces the size of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, June 9 at 09:32 AM, quoth Hein Zelle:
>I use the following macro
>
>macro index F ":set mime_forward=yes\n"
>macro pager F ":set mime_forward=yes\n"
Just thought I would point out... You can compress that into a single
macro by putting a
Hi,
* Hein Zelle wrote:
is there a way to mime-forward multiple messages?
Yes, though you can't do it with issueing a forward. You first create
your message as usual and, when in the compose menu, use
function (default bound to 'A' IIRC) to attach any
number of message f
Dear Mutt users,
is there a way to mime-forward multiple messages? I use the following
macro
macro index F ":set mime_forward=yes\n"
macro pager F ":set mime_forward=yes\n"
to forward messages as an attachment, which works fine. It doesn't
work fine for multiple tag
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:57:59AM +0200, Dragos_C wrote:
> How to select multiple messages for moving (deleting)?
Use tag-message which is bound to 't' by default.
Read more about 'tagg
How to select multiple messages for moving (deleting)?
--
Best regards
Dragos_C
Jeroen Valcke wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 07:44:06AM -0400, Mr. Wade wrote:
> > Please fix your "Mail-Followup-To:" header.
>
> Oke, several people on this list complained about my Mail-Followup-To
> header not being correct. I really want to fix this since I don't want to
> annoy anybody wi
Jeroen,
I think all you need to do is define the distribution lists
you subscribe to in your .muttrc file like this:
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And, when you reply to a message on this list, use 'L' [that's
capital L, so shift key and 'l']. This will set your
Mai
Jeroen Valcke wrote:
> Hey,
> I want to mark multiple msgs as read. I have some mailing lists and I
> don't want to read all msgs. How can I mark these as read.
> It is possible to tag them all. But what then. Ctl-R (Mark Thread as
> read) doesn't work on all the tagged msg only the selected msg
>
Jeroen Valcke wrote:
> I want to mark multiple msgs as read. I have some mailing lists and I
> don't want to read all msgs. How can I mark these as read.
> It is possible to tag them all. But what then. Ctl-R (Mark Thread as
> read) doesn't work on all the tagged msg only the selected msg
> Thanks
Jeroen Valcke:
> Hey,
> I want to mark multiple msgs as read. I have some mailing lists and I
> don't want to read all msgs. How can I mark these as read.
> It is possible to tag them all. But what then. Ctl-R (Mark Thread as
> read) doesn't work on all the tagged msg only the selected msg
> Than
Hey,
I want to mark multiple msgs as read. I have some mailing lists and I
don't want to read all msgs. How can I mark these as read.
It is possible to tag them all. But what then. Ctl-R (Mark Thread as
read) doesn't work on all the tagged msg only the selected msg
Thanks.
-Jeroen-
--
Jeroen Va
On 2000.12.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mark Triggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> When I write a message which has multiple addresses in the To: header,
> the force_name option (set in my .muttrc) causes the mail to be automatically
> saved to a file as the first
Hey all,
When I write a message which has multiple addresses in the To: header,
the force_name option (set in my .muttrc) causes the mail to be automatically
saved to a file as the first recipient in the list. For example, if I send a
mail to jimmy, bill and john, the mail is save
On 000530, at 15:27:11, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
> > quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
>
> My thoughts e
Bob, et al --
...and then Bob Bell said...
%
% Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
% the "References" field?
In my limited experience, mutt figures its Refs: and I-R-T: fields
from the first message in the tagged list, probably based on the current
sort order.
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> My thoughts exactly. I'd tag all relevant messages, and then just
> hit ';g' or whatever over the message where I want the followups to
> appear. This would be a really nice feature, as my threading is
> currently getting messed up
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
> quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
> Maybe something like "if the current message is tagged, use that as
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
> Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
> the "References" field?
Not that I know of.
I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or any
I really like the ability in mutt to be able to reply to (thereby
quoting) multiple messages in a single response. Also, the threading
of messages in wonderful. However, when I reply to multiple messages,
often it picks up the "References" from a message other than the one I
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999, Shao Zhang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| Thanks for all the replies about bounce multiple messages.
| I now have a special situation, where I need to bounce messages
| from 1 to 1. Is there an easy to tag them all??
T~m1-1
/kim
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies about bounce multiple messages.
I now have a special situation, where I need to bounce messages
from 1 to 1. Is there an easy to tag them all??
Thanks.
Shao
On 1999-12-23 16:49:35 +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages to
> the same user in one go??
> Can I use tag to achieve that??
You can - just try it. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Shao --
...and then Shao Zhang said...
% Hi,
% Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages
% to the same user in one go??
%
% Can I use tag to achieve that??
Well, let's see:
t
t
t
;b
Bounce tagged messages to:
ctrl-g
r
Yep.
%
% Thanks.
HTH & Happy Holid
Hi,
Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages
to the same user in one go??
Can I use tag to achieve that??
Thanks.
Shao
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _
There is a problem with the mutt-users list, well no the list
but a user re-injecting messages into the list.
They have now been removed, but there is a 1500 or so backlog
to clear. Most sensible MTA are detecting a mail loop and
bouncing them back to me
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20
42 matches
Mail list logo
