Hi,
* Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-07 10:42]:
>>In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
>>support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
>>encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
>>*serious* security
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:42:07 +0100
> From: Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LWN
>
> On 2001-12-06 23:35:43 +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
>
> >In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noti
On 2001-12-06 23:35:43 +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
>In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
>support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
>encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
>*serious* security hole
* Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/07/01 01:27]:
> * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 06. 2001 22:23]:
> >
> > In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
> > support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
> > encrypted messa
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 06. 2001 22:23]:
>
> In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
> support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
> encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
> *serious*
Hi,
In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
*serious* security hole that it shares with Mutt).
Why does he mention (3) as a
Hi all!
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux
> >Weekly News" (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by
> >Erik Kidd. To me, all of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt
> >can't search message
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Evolution is a new-style Personal Information Manager - that is,
Funnily it looks just like Outlook, which of course all the
MS hating geeks have been moaning about ;) So MS must have
got something right.
Steve
p.s. geek is no
On 2001-12-06 11:24:28 +0100, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
>Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux
>Weekly News" (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by
>Erik Kidd. To me, all of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt
>can't search message bodies."
Frankly, I don't
Jesper Holmberg writes:
> Hi all!
>
> Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux Weekly News"
> (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by Erik Kidd. To me, all
> of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt can't search message bodies.", but
> I guess someone more knowledg
Hi all!
Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux Weekly News"
(www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by Erik Kidd. To me, all
of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt can't search message bodies.", but
I guess someone more knowledgeful than I am could compose a respo
11 matches
Mail list logo
