> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:42:07 +0100
> From: Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LWN
>
> On 2001-12-06 23:35:43 +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
>
> >In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
> >support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to
> >encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
> >*serious* security hole that it shares with Mutt).
>
> >Why does he mention (3) as a security hole ?
>
> Probably because (3) is indeed mutt's default behaviour - but
> actually something PGP-using people will normally configure
> differently.
>
> But ok, that's the general problem with mutt for most users: It has
> to be configured properly.
Does that mean that the default configuration is improper?
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
11:33AM up 44 days, 22:16, 6 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
