On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Yeah, I've been trying to explain this to some folks around here
> > recently, but not having much success. You have my sympathy.
>
> Agreed. It is frustrating. But Derek, please don't give up!
I gave up a LOOONG time ago. Like
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> A couple more ideas:
>
> 'maildrop' comes with some nice tools for working with mail in
> scripts. (It's also a rather good filtering / routing / piping /
> you-name-it MDA.)
Maildrop is awesome and so much better than procmail.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
>
> We are a small company ahd IT is only one of his many jobss along
> with facilities, planning, project management and others. He got IT
> because nobody else was willing to do it. The explanation I got for
> not embracing an integr
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> On 2020-04-28 00:20,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've since written a filter to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:20:16AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
I wonder if you could just forward that sanitized block to yourself
as plain-text ... then mutt should deal with it just fine?
I tried that and Mutt forwards the original
On 2020-04-28 00:20,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > > extra formatting before passing
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've given up politely asking
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:57PM -0600, Akkana Peck wrote:
>
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > > > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > > > to me. I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
> > out of w3m is now properl
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> > Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> > guy refuse
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > > to me. It's a losing battle. :(
Since I don't have to deal with PGP, increasing
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've given up politely asking people to remember to send email as
> > either both text/html and text/plain or just text/plain when sending
> > to me. It's a losing battl
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted ema
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
> > however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check the
> > processed output because n
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check the
processed output because no sane person would wrap a PGP block in
HTML!
Yes, sorry that's right. Mutt
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jens John wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> > handle encypted emails.
>
> Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and
> sign
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:13:59AM +0100, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> On 2020-04-26 08:04,
> Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> > On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> > David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
> > Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> > perh
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> handle encypted emails.
Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and
signing with S/MIME. Perhaps your IT guy would be more open to just
using a
On 2020-04-26 08:04,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> perhaps piping the -dumped text through cat -s or --squeeze-blank
> might work - e.g.
On 2020-04-25 21:46,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted emai
Hi,
My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
encypted emails. Consequently, I receive such sensitive material as
traditional, PGP
21 matches
Mail list logo
