On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:54:41AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Majorly annoying problem; very simple solution.
We call that a 'cockpit' error
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Url
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This did the trick. It seems that the problem was that I had my
> editor (vim) start at the first blank line after the headers (right
> below Reply-To). When going into insert mode with "i" it incorporated
> Reply-To into the body. If I go into insert
This did the trick. It seems that the problem was that I had my
editor (vim) start at the first blank line after the headers (right below
Reply-To). When going into insert mode with "i" it incorporated
Reply-To into the body. If I go into insert mode with "o" (skipping a
line after Reply-To) it
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 04:27:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Oddly, if I reply to a message the Reply-To stays in the header. The problem
> only manifests itself when I compose a new message.
Try removing the extra blank line and see if it gets added again -- if not,
it's in the original setup
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 04:11:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Yup, if I do multiple edits, I get multiple Reply-To headers. Here is an
> example of editing, going to compose, and editing again 4 times over:
>
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Either that, or Mutt thinks there's something wrong with the line just
> previous to the Reply-To header, and so it thinks that that must be the
> end of the headers, and parses the Reply-To as if it was part of the
> body. On my system, the line just above Reply-To is the Subject header.
It o
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I first edit the message, everything looks fine. If I return to
> the compose screen and then edit again, my original Reply-To header is
> in the body and I have a new Reply-To header in the headers. Most
> odd.
What editor are you using? Is it
Oddly, if I reply to a message the Reply-To stays in the header. The problem
only manifests itself when I compose a new message.
Cheers,
Ron
--
Ronald L. Johnson
Sr. Systems and Networks Administrator, Perl Addict
MERL - A Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory
http://www.merl.com
Yup, if I do multiple edits, I get multiple Reply-To headers. Here is an
example of editing, going to compose, and editing again 4 times over:
From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: test
Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Test 3
Reply-
Quoting David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What if you edit the message, return to the compose screen, then select
> edit again? Does the header move to the body of the message? If it
> doesn't, then I don't see how it could be the editor's fault.
>
> Strange, either way.
When I first edit
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that it must be some kind of bad interaction between
> edit_headers and my editor (vim). When I edit mail everything looks
> OK and the Reply-To field is in the headers. It just seems to add a
> blank line before it is sent out.
What if you edi
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is an odd problem. Mutt normally does not insert a Reply-To header
> unless it has a value to assign the header. However, if you have
> full-header editing turned on, a blank Reply-To header will be inserted
> so that you can put something in, i
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not have a REPLYTO environment variable. I do have the reply_to
> option set in my .muttrc, but according to the doco that is just used
> for replying to listmail. I've tried unsetting it just in case, but
> that did not help.
This is an odd probl
Ollivier Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you have a REPLYTO environment variable ? If yes, remove it.
I do not have a REPLYTO environment variable. I do have the reply_to
option set in my .muttrc, but according to the doco that is just used
for replying to listmail. I've tried unsettin
According to Ron Johnson:
> I've just made the switch from gnus to mutt, and so far I really like it.
> The only real problem I've seen so far is getting rid of this bothersome
> Reply-To header that is appended to my messages. It does not even seem
Do you have a REPLYTO e
Reply-To:
Howdy,
I've just made the switch from gnus to mutt, and so far I really like it. The only
real problem I've seen so far is getting rid of this bothersome Reply-To header that
is appended to my messages. It does not even seem to get put into the headers
correctly (as c
16 matches
Mail list logo
