On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:37:52PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:28:30PM +0100, Mihai Lazarescu wrote:
> >Single expression
> >date: works as a shorthand for date:...
> >For example, date:monday matches from the beginning of
> >Monday until the e
On Tue Nov30'21 04:00:08PM, Chris Green wrote:
> From: Chris Green
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:00:08 +
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: Search program that can find an E-Mail with an exact Date:
> match
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:24:10AM -0500, John H
On 30Nov21 11:00+, Chris Green wrote:
> Yes, it is rather an odd requirement and driven by history, a typical
> "if I did that now I wouldn't do it that way"! :-)
Thanks for revealing some background about it :) I find it always
interesting, how things roll on other ends.
Probably, I would ha
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:24:10AM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> I find this discussion a bit…surprising? It seems like "mboxgrep"
> (https://datatipp.se/mboxgrep/)
> does this just fine. E.g.
>
> mboxgrep -rH -m maildir 'Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 21:24:26 -0700' dir
>
> recursively searches t
here are email messages that happen to
have that same date string in their bodies (e.g. quoting messages):
fgrep -r 'Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 21:24:26 -0700' dir
And of course you could add a ^ to the front and make it a regexp (and add -G
in the case of mboxgrep, or switch to grep fr
Well, you might give it a shot a program called "Notmuch" or "Mu"
...both are mail indexer and search . Importantly , they have
machanism
to integrate with most of the editors.
Thanks,
Bhaskar
Chris Green writes:
I'm looking for a way to find (and display) an E-Mai
u are asking for.
>
Yes, it is rather an odd requirement and driven by history, a typical
"if I did that now I wouldn't do it that way"! :-)
I have a personal wiki (Dokuwiki) where I keep lots of information,
mostly for my own use but also for family and friends.
A long time ago (2009
On 29Nov21 17:36+, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> But does it do it recursively down a hierarchy of folders? That's
> what I need.
Afaik, no. Mutt search/limits work on the current opened mailbox.
What you are trying to achieve is from my p
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:03:31PM +,
> Chris Green wrote:
> > From: Chris Green
> > Sender: Mutt-users
> > To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:03:31 +
> > Subject: Se
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:03:31PM +,
Chris Green wrote:
> From: Chris Green
> Sender: Mutt-users
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:03:31 +
> Subject: Search program that can find an E-Mail with an exact Date: match
> I'm looking for a way to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:28:30PM +0100, Mihai Lazarescu wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:03:31 +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for a way to find (and display) an E-Mail when I know the
> > exact value of the Date: header.
>
> notmuch appears
On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:03:31 +, Chris Green wrote:
I'm looking for a way to find (and display) an E-Mail when I know the
exact value of the Date: header.
notmuch appears to match specific date/times:
date:.. or date:
DATE AND TIME SEARCH
notmuch understa
I'm looking for a way to find (and display) an E-Mail when I know the
exact value of the Date: header.
The 'usual' search programs such as Mairix can't do this as they all
expect a date range and also expect it to be at least a day long.
I've also tried grepmail but tha
On 30Mar2019 15:34, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 29.03.19 13:37, Max Görner wrote:
thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to
learn that
others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself.
That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in
On 30.03.19 09:37, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Aside: I sort new-to-top, the reverse of the default, because I like to see
> the whole thread before replying. I found sorting conventionally got me
> involved before I'd seen followon posts saying the same stuff I was saying.
Hmmm ... that bears consid
On 29.03.19 13:37, Max Görner wrote:
> Dear list users,
>
> thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to learn that
> others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself.
> That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in t
On 29Mar2019 18:21, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 28.03.19 13:24, Max Görner wrote:
I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would
love to
have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
same thread.
I wonder whether one could just configure m
On 28Mar2019 22:05, Gregor Zattler wrote:
I send every email to me via Bcc: the incoming Bcc: copy is
handled by the same procmail scripts as all email and therefore
the email will go in the same folder(s). Admittedly I get
duplicates this way, but I use procmail also as a duplicate
filter an a
Dear list users,
thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to learn that
others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself.
That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in the Inbox.
Thank you for all the replies.
Sincerely
Max Görner
On 28.03.19 13:24, Max Görner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to
> have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
> same thread.
>
> I wonder whether one could just configure mutt such as to save all send
Hi Max,
* Max Görner [2019-03-28; 13:24]:
> I wonder whether one could just configure mutt such as to save all send
> messages to Inbox again. Of course, that would clutter the inbox severely, but
>
> a) I have a hook limiting the view to ~(~N|~F) already
> b) the cluttering might be counterac
On Thursday 28 March 2019 13:24,
Max Görner put forth the proposition:
> Hello,
>
> I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to
> have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
> same thread.
>
> I wonder whether one could just config
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 13:24:22 +0100, Max Görner wrote:
> I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to
> have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
> same thread.
Well, GMail and Mutt threading is different. Mutt uses Message-Id
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, at 13:32, Max Görner wrote:
> Could some readers of this list please share their opinion/experiences with
> me?
As someone who is only using mutt's threaded view, it's terrific and achieves
exactly the behaviour I want from a mail client. mutt's way of displaying
threads --
Hello,
I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to
have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
same thread.
I wonder whether one could just configure mutt such as to save all send
messages to Inbox again. Of course, that would cl
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 01:37:59PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 28Jan2017 14:43, Chris Green wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 02:50:05PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > Are you talking about ordering the index view (listing of messages) or are
> > > you talking about receiving a top-po
set wait_key'
set my_pop_wait_key=':set wait_key=$my_prior_wait_key'
set my_toggle_rot13="$my_push_wait_key=noflag ! MUTT_ROT13 -e flag
MUTT_ROT13$my_pop_wait_key"
macro index \Cx "$my_toggle_rot13" 'toggle MUTT_ROT13'
macro pager \Cx "$my_toggle_rot13
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 02:50:05PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 26Jan2017 16:30, Chris Green wrote:
> > As it's my day for asking questions here's another:-
> >
> > Are there any scripts out there for automating the process of putting
> > E-Mails in
On 26Jan2017 16:30, Chris Green wrote:
As it's my day for asking questions here's another:-
Are there any scripts out there for automating the process of putting
E-Mails in the correct order - i.e. reply *below* quotes? I looked at
tofu (at http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/) but I
As it's my day for asking questions here's another:-
Are there any scripts out there for automating the process of putting
E-Mails in the correct order - i.e. reply *below* quotes? I looked at
tofu (at http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/) but I think that just
removes excess and doesn&
El d�a Wednesday, July 13, 2016 a las 04:20:02AM -0700, David Champion escribi�:
> * On 13 Jul 2016, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there some function in mutt's source which validates e-mail addrs?
> > Thanks
>
> Validates in what s
* On 13 Jul 2016, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there some function in mutt's source which validates e-mail addrs?
> Thanks
Validates in what sense?
There are parse_address and (more broadly) rfc822_parse_adrlist, which
will reject or complete certain kinds of ma
El d�a Wednesday, July 13, 2016 a las 04:20:02AM -0700, David Champion escribi�:
> * On 13 Jul 2016, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there some function in mutt's source which validates e-mail addrs?
> > Thanks
>
> Validates in what sen
Hi,
Is there some function in mutt's source which validates e-mail addrs?
Thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎
+49-176-38902045
"Wer übersieht, dass wir uns den anderen weggenommen haben und sie uns
wiederhaben wollen,
ka
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:12:08AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > The muttrc configuration also automatically uses the above
> > configuration file to set the 'lists', 'subscribe' and 'mailboxes'
> > entries. It's this that tools like
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> The muttrc configuration also automatically uses the above
> configuration file to set the 'lists', 'subscribe' and 'mailboxes'
> entries. It's this that tools like procmail (and sieve?) can't do.
One way I've dealt with the 'mailboxe
configuration file (which is all that changes if I add/remove a
> mailing list) just has lines like:-
>
> audacityLi audacity-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Audacity-users
>
> The first field becomes my alias for sending messages to the list and
> is also t
my alias for sending messages to the list and
> is also the destination mailbox for received messages. The second
> column is the directory the mailbox is in (there's an In and a Tm as
> well as Li). The third field (obviously) is the full list E-Mail
> address and the fourth (opti
setup that dictates the best solution!
>
My configuration file (which is all that changes if I add/remove a
mailing list) just has lines like:-
audacityLi audacity-us...@lists.sourceforge.net Audacity-users
The first field becomes my alias for sending messages to the list and
is
** Chris Green [2016-05-17 08:31]:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:37:52PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2016-05-16 08:31 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, after using procmail and sieve, and my own module libraries for
> > both perl and python for a long time, this is exactly what I do n
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:37:52PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2016-05-16 08:31 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > That's interesting, thank you. I run the mail server for my own mail,
> > it's postfix on my desktop machine which is on all the time. It might
> > be that sieve will be more flex
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:04:54PM +0100, Paul Tansom wrote:
> ** Joel Buckley [2016-05-15 12:39]:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > >As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
> > >E-Mail in its inbox without the
** Joel Buckley [2016-05-15 12:39]:
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> >As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
> >E-Mail in its inbox without the user seeing/doing anything at all?
> >
> >E.g. is there some sort of
On 15-05-2016, at 13h 26'37", Matthias Apitz wrote about "Re: Can one do
something to an E-Mail without even opening/seeing it in mutt?"
>
> PS: Please do not top post
>
Sorry. In the last 2 years or so I get 99% of e-mail from outlook
users that do not know to sc
ject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
E-Mail in its inbox without the user seeing/doing anything at all?
E.g. is there some sort of hook that can, for example, reply to or
delete an E-Mail from a specific address without any user interaction?
--
Chris Green
* Chris Green [05-15-16 05:36]:
> As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
> E-Mail in its inbox without the user seeing/doing anything at all?
>
> E.g. is there some sort of hook that can, for example, reply to or
> delete an E-Mail from a specific addr
El domingo, 15 de mayo de 2016 12:51:19 (CEST), Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă
escribió:
...
I do not see any reason you would want to accomplish that within mutt
itself.
I do see: if the OP is not using some MTA, but mutt+IMAP, procmail is
difficult
to involve.
matthias
PS: Please do not
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:51:19PM +0200, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> On 15-05-2016, at 10h 30'49", Chris Green wrote about "Can one do something
> to an E-Mail without even opening/seeing it in mutt?"
> > As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do s
El día Sunday, May 15, 2016 a las 10:30:49AM +0100, Chris Green escribió:
> As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
> E-Mail in its inbox without the user seeing/doing anything at all?
>
> E.g. is there some sort of hook that can, for example, reply to or
&
Hi,
You could use procmail. This will act on the e-mail before it is
delivered to an inbox. Depending on your needs the action can be to
store the e-mail, to delete it, to send an automatic reply, etc.
I can give you few examples of recipes you need to put in your
$HOME/.procmailrc.
I do not
As per the subject is it possible for mutt to do something to an
E-Mail in its inbox without the user seeing/doing anything at all?
E.g. is there some sort of hook that can, for example, reply to or
delete an E-Mail from a specific address without any user interaction?
--
Chris Green
On 28Feb2016 12:13, Grady Martin wrote:
On 2016年02月20日 08時33分, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Sounds like your scroll wheel causes your terminal to send and key
sequences. So you probably want to rebind these. Their defaults seem to be
and . Try binding them like this:
macro pager
macro pager
On 2016年02月20日 08時33分, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Sounds like your scroll wheel causes your terminal to send and key
sequences. So you probably want to rebind these. Their defaults seem to be
and . Try binding them like this:
macro pager
macro pager
Is there any particular reason for usin
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 08:33:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 19Feb2016 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
> >When I scroll with my scroll wheel (on a trackball, but it's the same
> >as a mouse scroll wheel) while viewing an E-Mail in mutt it doesn't
> >scroll the
On 19Feb2016 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
When I scroll with my scroll wheel (on a trackball, but it's the same
as a mouse scroll wheel) while viewing an E-Mail in mutt it doesn't
scroll the text in the viewing window but scrolls up and down the list
of E-Mails. E-mails thus flash pas
When I scroll with my scroll wheel (on a trackball, but it's the same
as a mouse scroll wheel) while viewing an E-Mail in mutt it doesn't
scroll the text in the viewing window but scrolls up and down the list
of E-Mails. E-mails thus flash past at great speed and I don't ge
On 15 Oct 16:04, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Alan Leoni [10-15-15 14:08]:
> [...]
> > The question is: How do I choose the correct e-mail address? Is there a
> > macro to do that?
>
> So you are not worried about the tranmission but the "From:"
* Alan Leoni [10-15-15 14:08]:
[...]
> The question is: How do I choose the correct e-mail address? Is there a
> macro to do that?
So you are not worried about the tranmission but the "From:" address?
Somewhat confusing the way you asked.
In .muttrc you can set a "defa
tp_url=smtps://$my_user:$my_p...@smtp.gmail.com
set realname="Alan Leoni"
set from=alanle...@gmail.com
I want that the folders where I save the messages (inbox, postponed and sent
) remain the same (I use POP to get email), but they are sent from different
addresses.
The question is: How d
* Alan Leoni [10-15-15 13:03]:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm bettering my mutt configuration and I've a problem. I can't choose
> manually which e-mail account I want to use to send e-mails.
>
> In my muttrc I've the following configuration:
>
> folde
Hi everybody,
I'm bettering my mutt configuration and I've a problem. I can't choose
manually which e-mail account I want to use to send e-mails.
In my muttrc I've the following configuration:
folder-hook ~/Mail/gmail/* source ~/.mutt/account/gmailrc
folder-hook ~/Mail/
On 2014-02-11 16:43:35 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> I don't know what this has to to with ~p, I'm only responding to the
> subject with how I distinguish CC'd and To'd mail.
I find the status insufficient for quickly identifying the most
important e-mails -- only col
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:03:33AM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-02-11 00:29:17 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > In my .muttrc I have:
> >
> > set to_chars=" +TCF"
> >
> > See table 2.6 in the documentation.
>
> How does this affect the behaviour of ~p? As far as I can tell, this
> only ap
On 2014-02-11 00:29:17 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> In my .muttrc I have:
>
> set to_chars=" +TCF"
>
> See table 2.6 in the documentation.
How does this affect the behaviour of ~p? As far as I can tell, this
only appears to have to do with what is displayed in the status
indicator.
pgpiuFJt
On 2014-02-11 00:03:17 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:49:55PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> > I got an interesting mail from Nikola Petrov off-list saying that his
> > Mutt configuration does not interpret ~p as including Cc'd mails.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to keep the m
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:03:17AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:49:55PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> > I got an interesting mail from Nikola Petrov off-list saying that his
> > Mutt configuration does not interpret ~p as including Cc'd mails.
>
> Wouldn't it be better t
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:49:55PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> I got an interesting mail from Nikola Petrov off-list saying that his
> Mutt configuration does not interpret ~p as including Cc'd mails.
Wouldn't it be better to keep the mails on list? Could get confusing
otherwise.
--
"If you're no
I got an interesting mail from Nikola Petrov off-list saying that his
Mutt configuration does not interpret ~p as including Cc'd mails.
- In my case, if I limit to ~p, I get messages with the C flag set.
- In his case, if he limits to ~p, he (apparently) does not.
Is there some configuration opti
On 2014-02-09 22:35:01 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Given that, you could probably use these two simple patterns, though
> doesn't look like they can make use of $alternates directly.
>
>~c EXPR messages carbon-copied to EXPR
>~t EXPR messages addressed to EXPR
>
> I am no
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:23:56PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-02-09 10:38:25 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > Doesn't %Z in index_format or pager_format give you that information?
>
> How does that help me to colour it?
>
> It is much quicker to read and interpret colors than stuff in the ind
On 2014-02-09 10:38:25 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Doesn't %Z in index_format or pager_format give you that information?
How does that help me to colour it?
It is much quicker to read and interpret colors than stuff in the index
format.
pgpDda8Dv3iSx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:23:08AM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> Right now I color my e-mails bright red when they match ~p. This is
> useful, but it aso highlights when I am Cc'd on a message, and I would
> like to only have e-mails that have me in the To header to be
> highlighte
Right now I color my e-mails bright red when they match ~p. This is
useful, but it aso highlights when I am Cc'd on a message, and I would
like to only have e-mails that have me in the To header to be
highlighted.
Of course, I can use ~c and ~t, but this doesn't consult alternates
rote:
> > > If you keep track, you'll probably find, as I have, that HTML-only
> > > e-mail is between 99% to 100% spam.
> >
> > HTML email is sent exclusively by three groups of people:
> >
> > 1. Ignorant newbies
> > 2. Ineducable morons
>
Changing the subject so this (hopefully) doesn't restart the endless
thread.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:27:42AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:44:35PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
> > If you keep track, you'll probably find, as I have, that HTML
* On 21 Nov 2012, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> On 21/11/12 at 07:00pm, David Champion wrote:
> >
> > You could create a personal translation, I guess.
>
> Have any idea how to do?
Only roughly (I haven't done it): create your own mutt.po file, override
the right message in it, compile it with msgfmt,
On 21/11/12 at 07:00pm, David Champion wrote:
>
> You could create a personal translation, I guess.
>
Have any idea how to do?
--
Marcelo
Brasil (Brazil, for English Speakers)
Linux user number 487797
* On 21 Nov 2012, E. Prom wrote:
> 2012/11/21 Will Yardley :
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote:
> >>
> >> When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the
> >> answer is set to "Re: your mail".
> >
2012/11/21 Will Yardley :
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote:
>>
>> When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the
>> answer is set to "Re: your mail".
>
> I thought it was configurable, but didn't find anyth
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote:
>
> When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the
> answer is set to "Re: your mail".
I thought it was configurable, but didn't find anything from a quick
search in TFM. Also, it looks like i
Hi,
When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the
answer is set to "Re: your mail".
I would like to customize/localize it, but it does not seem to be an
option. Have I missed something? (No, I would prefer keeping using
Debian's binaries ;-)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:06:45PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I have mail in mutt with the an encoded Subject: line which seems to decode
> wrong (the German Umlaut ü is not shown); how could I decode the line
>
> Subject:
> =?UTF-8?B?Uu+/vWNrc2VuZHVuZyAoTnIuIEUtQS0yMTcyKSBhYmdlc2NobG9zc2
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:16:17AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:12:25AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > Ok, I just did that. Now let's see if this is bold or if this is
> > underlined.
> >
> > One thing I don't remember is how to specify colors
>
> I also forgot th
[ Jim Graham wrote on Wed 19.Sep'12 at 8:12:25 -0500 ]
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:02:49PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > Jim
> Graham wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000,
> m...@raf.org wrote: > > > check the email headers. i tried the above
> and the resulting email > stil
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:12:25AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
> Ok, I just did that. Now let's see if this is bold or if this is
> underlined.
>
> One thing I don't remember is how to specify colors
I also forgot that the usual line breaks go awayand how to
make line breaks. What a mes
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:02:49PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > Jim Graham wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > > > check the email headers. i tried the above and the resulting email > still had the usual "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii"
I meant
Jim Graham wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
>
> I tried a few tests with it last night. I used
>my_hdr Content-Type: text/enriched
> in my ~/.muttrc, and tried a few simple tags (bold, underline, etc.) and
> the result was text with tags mixed in.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> at least my Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) on my ubuntu-11.04 system at home
> can render it but my Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) on a debian-6.0 system
> doesn't render it at all. that's odd. they have the same compile options
> but different p
Jim Graham wrote:
> I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
> using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to
> html, but it wasn't html. It was limited to simple text markup such
> as bold, simple colors, *maybe* itali
* Hratch Megerditchian :
> How do I unsubscribe from mutt as I don't want to receive any emails from
> mutt
List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@mutt.org, body only
"unsubscribe mutt-users"
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
How can I unsubscribe from mutt as I don't want to receive emails
Can you help
-Original Message-
From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf
Of m...@raf.org
Sent: 19 September 2012 08:55
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Old e-mail markup languag
How do I unsubscribe from mutt as I don't want to receive any emails from
mutt
Can you help
-Original Message-
From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf
Of Jim Graham
Sent: 19 September 2012 07:39
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Old e-mail m
Jim Graham wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:32:59PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> > m...@raf.org wrote:
> >
> > > Jim Graham wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
> > > > using
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:32:59PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> m...@raf.org wrote:
>
> > Jim Graham wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
> > > using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some r
m...@raf.org wrote:
> Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
> > using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to
> > html, but it wasn't html. It was limited to simple text mark
I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was
using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to
html, but it wasn't html. It was limited to simple text markup such
as bold, simple colors, *maybe* italic and underline (don't remember),
and
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 20:05, Chip Camden wrote:
> My only excuse is that I'm getting old. So I put this in my .muttrc:
>
> message-hook .'bind pager l list-reply; bind pager r reply'
> message-hook ~l 'bind pager r list-reply; bind pager l reply'
>
> Now 'r' does what I want most of the
Quoth Jim Graham on Saturday, 22 October 2011:
> I did it again...regular reply instead of a list reply
> My chemobrain (brain nuked by two types of chemotherapy, both very
> hard on the brain, plus tumors, plus three brain surgeries, plus
> max-dose radiation ... I do at least have an excuse!)
Interesting... List reply doesn't work if the list is CCd,
and not in the From: field. I never noticed that before.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:35:41AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
>
> I haven't tried this and it's only off the cuff, but perhaps a
> send2-hook setting $sendmail would work:
I d
1 - 100 of 324 matches
Mail list logo
