answer possibly got canned. :)
> >
> > Is there any way to get the little plus signs to go away in Mutt that appear
> > at the beginning of a line break like this:
> >
> > +blah blah
> >
> > I would like the broken lines to continue so links won't be broken
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:58:09PM -0600, llwy...@suddenlink.net wrote:
>
> I'm sorry if this was answered, I sent the question before but I think I had
> my procmail entry screwed up and the answer possibly got canned. :)
>
> Is there any way to get the little plus sign
I'm sorry if this was answered, I sent the question before but I think I had
my procmail entry screwed up and the answer possibly got canned. :)
Is there any way to get the little plus signs to go away in Mutt that appear
at the beginning of a line break like this:
+blah blah
I would
Quoth llwy...@suddenlink.net on Monday, 20 December 2010:
> What are the little plus signs for and how to get rid of them? They are at
> the beginning of some lines of text like this:
>
> +blah blah blah...
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
&g
What are the little plus signs for and how to get rid of them? They are at
the beginning of some lines of text like this:
+blah blah blah...
Thanks
--
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask
Hello Kyle,
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 10:35:23 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> mutt assumes that the file output by your editor conforms to
> $attach_charset.
Mutt requires that messages composed in $editor and saved are in
*$charset*. Mutt guesses that pre-existing text files you're sen
On Wed, Mar 19 2008, Chris G wrote:
>
>
Only the subject line is wrong ;)
Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
* Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-08 11:37]:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:09:46AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-08 11:07]:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > this one displays correctly,
> > Content-Type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 19 at 03:15 PM, quoth Chris G:
> How does mutt set about deciding what charset header to add?
Like this: mutt assumes that the file output by your editor conforms
to $attach_charset. It then uses iconv to convert that character se
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:09:46AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-08 11:07]:
> >
> >
> >
>
> this one displays correctly,
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
Yes, it does for me too
On 19 Mar 2008 15:04 +, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris G):
>
These came through correctly.
--
Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. http://michael.kjorling.se
* . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . *
* ENCR
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:10:03PM +, Chris G wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:03:46PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > �
> >
> Well that's clever, the mystery charset adder has decided this is
> utf-8 even though the characters I entered were iso-8859-1 pounds!
>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:03:46PM +, Chris G wrote:
> �
>
Well that's clever, the mystery charset adder has decided this is
utf-8 even though the characters I entered were iso-8859-1 pounds!
Aarrgghh!! So when I compose a message with iso-8859-1 in it
(incor
* Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-08 11:07]:
>
>
>
this one displays correctly,
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org
* Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-08 11:04]:
> �
no change.
header reports: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-
--
Chris Green
�
--
Chris Green
On 000125, at 09:45:12, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I am finding it odd that I have "+" signs in wrapped text in mail that I
> receive, however I do have "set markers" commented out...
Per the manual:
markers
Type: boolean
Default: yes
To turn off marker
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 09:45:12AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I am finding it odd that I have "+" signs in wrapped text in mail that I
> receive, however I do have "set markers" commented out...
Perhaps "set markers" is default!
Try "unset markers
I am finding it odd that I have "+" signs in wrapped text in mail that I
receive, however I do have "set markers" commented out...
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the body of my msgs I have some + signs that have a white box
> around them. What is this an issue of?
Allow me to read some more from the manual to you, so that you need not
send further huge posts to the list:
6.3.75.
In the body of my msgs I have some + signs that have a white box around
them. What is this an issue of?
-
Jason Helfman Linux Advocate & User
http://www.digitalklown
22 matches
Mail list logo