On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:10:03PM +0000, Chris G wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:03:46PM +0000, Chris G wrote: > > ��������������������������������� > > > Well that's clever, the mystery charset adder has decided this is > utf-8 even though the characters I entered were iso-8859-1 pounds! > > Aarrgghh!! So when I compose a message with iso-8859-1 in it > (incorrectly) something somewhere is deciding it's a utf-8 message, > what's likely to be doing it? > Even more Aarrgghh!!, the copies of the iso-8859-1 and utf-8 messages in my sentmail folder have the incorrect charset headers too! So it *appears* to be mutt that is guessing the charset and adding the header itself as nothing else is involved in saving a copy of the message according to the "set record" is it?
How does mutt set about deciding what charset header to add? -- Chris Green