On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:59:05PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> ...
Thank you very much for your help... Now everything works
right. I have greatly appreciated your input.
Franz
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:23:48AM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Just put:
> set editor=/usr/bin/vim
> in your .muttrc
>
> Personalise your colours for vim in your .vimrc
> (Obviously, this is the wrong mailing list for discussions on vim as
> would discussions on mutt be on a vim mailing list.
> For background colors in the console:
>
> man setterm
Thanks! I'll look into that later on...
Franz
pgpQtK1UTew7I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thank you for taking the time to explain...
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:35:39PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Here's how you'd set it in a macro:
>
> macro index m 'set pgp_sign_as=0x31577172'
>
> I can mix that into your existing send-mail macro if you include
> that in your message.
Here's wha
OK, this is what I found out from experimentation and further
inquiry... What I initially wanted to achieve with nano (that
is, to make the whole screen background white while in console
- the same as with mutt) is impossible: nano allows only for color
*highlighting*, and that's all. The "colo
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 09:15:12PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
>
> If you plan to switch to vim at some point in the future, why would you
> want to bother about such trivial aspects as nano coloring?
>
> Don't waste time fine-tuning a car that's headed for the junkyard.
I do appreciate your perspecti
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:59:26AM +0200, Eyolf ?strem wrote:
>
> Is this perhaps the place to suggest a switch to vim...? Not only is
> it the best editor in existence, it also has any color scheme
> imaginable (and then some).
>
> For nano, you could google "nanorc". At dotfiles, there are som
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 06:23:43PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
>
> Dunno about nano but you certainly could do it with vim.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/fcky1000/fcky/pager.png
> http://www.geocities.com/fcky1000/fcky/editor.png
>
> Time to switch?
Actually I did install vim and used it for a while...
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 06:16:31PM -0400, John wrote:
>
> I flinch at the thought of the flame-wars that may result from this
> simple factual statement: my .muttrc reads
>
> # set my choice for editor
> set editor=/usr/bin/"emacs-snapshot -geometry 75x39"
>
> Substitute the emacs or other edito
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 01:14:59PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2007-09-16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > (what's "HTH?")
>
> Hope That Helps or Hope This Helps.
Yes, very much, thanks. You guys have been very much helpful...
What I still would like to know is, do I have to accept using
na
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:03:05AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> The color settings in your .muttrc allow you to choose from the
> palette provided by your terminal program. That is, for example,
> you can choose the terminal's red, the terminal's blue or the
> terminal's brightred, but if yo
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:44:42PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
>
> External editor (which need not be GUI like nano!) is always better
> than mutt's built-in (if you really meant that rather than merely a
> _textmode_ editor like vi), because built-in is too primitive to be
> happy with it all the time.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:25:05AM -0400, John wrote:
>
> Here's one way of doing it, mostly lifted from the efforts of
> others. You can fiddle with colors to suit yourself, of course.
Thank you so very much, John. Actually, right after looking at
your code I started fiddling with it as suggest
Hello everyone, this is my first message and I am new to Mutt...
installed 1.4.2.3 a few days ago... so far the learning curve
seems to be pretty steep, but at last I got to the point where I am
actually emailing with it. :)
I use it from console most of the time and tried a couple of color
co
14 matches
Mail list logo
