On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> > I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
> > required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
> >
> > The two places that
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:00:32AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 August 2000 at 06:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have just encountered another problem when using multiple IMAP
> > accounts - how do I set the $imap_user and $imap_pass to different
> > values for each IMAP serv
I have just encountered another problem when using multiple IMAP
accounts - how do I set the $imap_user and $imap_pass to different
values for each IMAP server?
When moving messages around I want to be able to stay logged in to
more than one IMAP account at the same time.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL
I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
release 6.1.
I think this may cause problems when this gets to a general release
ver
I think the current implementation of directory browsing needs to be
changed somewhat. I've muttered about this before but now I have a
practical situation where it's a real pain.
I want to move some messages from an IMAP server to local folders
(though the same problems would apply moving IMAP t
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:08:32PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Suresh, et al --
>
> ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
> % Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
> %
> % > However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
> % > *only* one in the folder then mu
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:29:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
>
> > However, there is one problem, if the dreaded IMAP message is the
> > *only* one in the folder then mutt gives an error "No messages matched
> > criteria." and does
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:24:21AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 August 2000 at 06:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:27:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > > Turns out you also can use:
> > > push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> > > or, I guess,
> > > push "l! ~h X-
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:38:14PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, David Champion whacked out:
>
> > Turns out you also can use:
> > push "! ~h X-IMAP:"
> > or, I guess,
> > push "l! ~h X-IMAP:\n"
>
> > I can't guess how much slower that might be, if any, bu
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:27:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> On 2000.08.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > push "l!~s '^DON'\\''T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA$'^M"
> >
> > This (I hope) anchors the string at both end
I'm experimenting with a UW IMAP server using mutt. The UW server
runs on a system where I have a shell login and gives me access
straight to my home directory there.
If I just open {halkidiki.areti.com} I get an error message in the
mutt status line which says:-
/usr/home/chris/.mh_profile
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 06:41:59PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Aug 2000:
> > push l ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
> >
> > but, at startup, mutt just says:-
> > Error in /usr/home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 96: push: too many arguments
> >
I'm trying to 'push' a 'limit' command at the end of my muttrc file
but without much success. This is trying to push the command to
ignore the dreaded UW IMAP server "DON'T DELETE THIS." messages.
What I have at the end of my muttrc file at the moment is:-
push l ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 09:44:37AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> On 2000.08.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have checked this out thoroughly now and I'm convinced there is some
> > sort of problem building 1.3.7 (and 1.3.6) on Solaris.
> >
I have checked this out thoroughly now and I'm convinced there is some
sort of problem building 1.3.7 (and 1.3.6) on Solaris.
N.B. the problem is when "Making all in imap" so it only occurs if you
configure with --enable-imap.
I have tried deleting the directory and re-extracting from the tarba
Re: my build problems with 1.3.7, I have tried some other versions:-
1.2.5 builds OK on my Solaris 2.6
1.3.5 builds OK
1.3.6 fails in the same way as I described for 1.3.7
1.3.7 fails
I have built 1.3.7 on Linux systems so it would seem that some change
between 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 has broken the bu
I am trying to build 1.3.7 on Solaris 2.6, I am building:-
--with-curses --enable-pop --enable-imap
I'm getting an error in the imap directory:-
Making all in imap
make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../types.h'
Current working directory /usr/chris/mutt-1.3.7/imap
I have a strange problem when opening IMAP folders with mutt. After
having experimented with a number of different IMAP clients some of my
IMAP folders when opened display an index like the one below:-
1 Nov 15 vile-users-help ( 92) vile-users response to "request" messa
2 F M
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:59:43AM -0700, Chris Cutler wrote:
> > I've been developing mutt's IMAP support against three IMAP4rev1
> > servers: UW-IMAP, Cyrus, and (occasionally) courier. There is some
> > code hanging around for handling pre-rev1 IMAP4 servers, but I haven't
> > made any attempts
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 12:03:13PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > Probably it won't help you too much if you don't have influence on the
> > admins, but the latest UofW imap (to be released very soon) does not
> > use this technique a
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:19:05PM +0530, Sunil Shetye wrote:
> Quoting from David T-G's mail on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400:
> > % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> > % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
>
> In fact, this problem
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 12:25:58PM +0200, Dirk Pirschel wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 26 Jul 2000:
>
> > What is this trying to tell me and what do I need to fix? E.g. *how*
> > do I "Try using libiconv instead" ?
>
> http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/packages-libiconv.html
>
OK, than
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:17:54AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
> % these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server?
>
> I think the closest thing was to either push a limit like
>
> push ! 'DELETE THIS MESSAGE'
>
That
I am trying to build 1.3.5 on a Solaris 2.6 system.
1.2.4 builds fine there, I have also build 1.3.5 on Linux OK, but
1.3.5 on Solaris gives:-
checking for iconv... yes
checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
What is this trying
I know this came up a while ago but I wasn't using a UW IMAP server
then. I have found that one of my free shell accounts is running this
IMAP server and I'd like to use it.
So, did anyone come up with a strategy for getting mutt to ignore
these messages which are put there by the UW IMAP server
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:10:50AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a question about changing folders. Suppose I've in my
> default mail directory `=' a subdirectory autosaves. To go
> to the mutt-users folder there I type something like
> c=aut/mu
> Ok. so far so good. Suppos
I just composed a mail in mutt and 'sent' it. Mutt then sat trying to
get an fcntl lock, presumably on my sentmail mbox, it failed after
however many tries it does.
My question is - was the mail sent or not?
Strangely enough when I fired up mutt again to look in the sentmail
file (mutt -f +sent
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:08:31AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> Correct - but there are several tiny m$-dog based servers like Mercury/32
> (the latest version of which has an esmtp module). You can set mercury to
> smarthost (relay) through
I just tagged a few messages and tried to save them to my IMAP
account. It just happened that the IMAP server wasn't running (I have
to rememeber to do it manually myself) and, not unreasonably, I got an
error message saying that mutt couldn't connect to the IMAP server.
The annoyance/bug is that
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:16:56PM +0200, Virginie [ ML ] wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anybody know how I could color the entire line of selected messages in front of
>the indicator ?
> I've set :
> indicator brightcyan black
> But as you know it just colors the arrow and I didn't find any other options :
Someone at work has a requirement for a command line MUA to use with
S/MIME. He has to automate sending E-Mail to customers with X.509
certificates in their mail programs. He says "I think the RSA BSAFE
toolkit is what I need."
Does anyone know how easy it would be to hook this into mutt? Has
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 11:12:32AM -0500, Scott A. Davis wrote:
> My company just installed a mail server that requires that mail be retrieved
> via POP 3.
>
> I have the following POP commands in my .muttrc
>
> set pop_host = "mail.mydomain.com"
> set pop_user = "my username"
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Nils Vogels wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i have to use two pop servers. i switch between them using macros. i need mutt to
>forget the pop password. any ideas?
> >
>
> Would it be an idea t
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:35:39PM +1000, Dennis Robertson wrote:
> Hello,
> Before I give up and retire hurt to netscape can anyone tell me in words
> of one syllable how to create mailboxes that work. I get the message
> from mutt that every one of the "mailboxes" I have designated is not a
> m
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 01:23:13PM -0500, Enrique Vadillo wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use mutt 1.0.1us with courier-imap using maildirs, i've
> tried to
> look into the mailing list archives but don't seem to find what i need.
>
You'd be better off with mutt 1.2 as it has quite a few IMAP
enhanceme
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:09:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What do you use for a $folder setting?
> >
> If I am *only* using the IMAP server with mutt then I have:-
> set folder={imap.server.name}
>
> and I have
> set spoolfile={x-1.net:50143}inbox
>
Of course the subtle ch
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:15:46AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 02:39:12AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > To create a new mailbox on the IMAP server it needs to named as
> > follows:-
> > {imap.server.name}INBOX.new_folder
>
> What do you use for a $folder sett
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 06:14:52PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I am using Mutt 1.2i with a server running courier-imap and vpopmail. I
> would like to be able to create remote folders and I understand
> courier-imap supports this. I'm just not sure what to specify for my
> folder path. On non-
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 05:54:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % Basically what I would like to see is POP support in mutt to be on the
> % line of IMAP support, polling of mailhost and delivering it to an INBOX
> % or something similiar.
>
> I can imagine that... Of course, it gets back to
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-08 09:54:49 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html
> >> %s;nametemplate=%s.html
>
> >> lynx really is in /usr/bin/lnyx, so what's missing?
>
> The copiousoutput entry
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 09:46:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have lynx working on one system to view HTML OK but on this system
> it isn't working for some reason.
>
> I have
>
> auto_view text/html
>
> in my muttrc file and I have a .mailcap file as follows:-
>
> text/html;
I have lynx working on one system to view HTML OK but on this system
it isn't working for some reason.
I have
auto_view text/html
in my muttrc file and I have a .mailcap file as follows:-
text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html %s;nametemplate=%s.html
lynx really is in /usr/bin/lny
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 02:00:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to move a load of tagged emails into another mailbox.
>
> I have worked out how to tag and copy them, but then I have to go through the
> list and delete each one in turn.
>
> Is there a way to
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:36:52PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % Oh thank you! :-)
>
> Hey, any time, pal! BTW, new email address?
>
Yes, I'm trying out this server in the USA rather than my previous
UK one, apart from anything else it's cheaper.
> % isn't an MDA involved.
>
> Er, I beg to di
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:25:03PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 2000:
> > It may be the 'right' answer but unless you have control of the IMAP
> > server it's not very practical is it! When using IMAP there really
> > isn't an MDA invol
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 03:49:31PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Thomas E. Dickey writes:
> > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:40:24AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
> % been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
>
> I'm sure we can help you. mutt is very likable :-) I'm no IMAP guy, and
> the bes
47 matches
Mail list logo
