Re: 'browser' - what is it?

Hello, Michael Tatge wrote on Sat, May 13 2000 16:51:34: > On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > > In general I think I'd prefe

Re: mailboxes lists

Hello, cFischer wrote on Wed, May 03 2000 08:54:36: > procmail can be installed, if i recall this right, without > priviledges, sgid mail and suid root. it drops priviledges as soon > as it knows who's recipe is running and the neccessary locks are in > place. Yeah, some people also told this

Re: mailboxes lists

Hello, cFischer wrote on Tue, May 02 2000 19:45:38: > On Mon-01.05.00-23:31, Stefan Bender wrote: > > I have in my .muttrc: > > > > set folder=~/Maildirs > > set spoolfile=+incoming > > set postponed=+postponed > > are you running procmail()? i ask this

Re: mailboxes lists

Hello, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote on Mon, May 01 2000 19:31:28: > On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 01:37:26PM +0200, Antonio Fragola wrote: > > GG> mailboxes +/FreeBSD/newbies > > is the '/' after '+' necessary? I always wrote: > > mailboxes +FreeBSD/newbies > > I presume it has to be here if you : > >

building mutt outside the source tree

Hello, I was wondering if it's possible to build mutt outside the source tree. Starting doing it I created a directory called `build-mutt' somewhere on my system and ran `/path/to/mutt-1.1.9/configure' with it's options, which semmed to work properly. But make stopped with the following output:

Re: attachments appear as NoName

Hi, On Thu, Mar 09 2000 14:11:46 -0500 wrote David T-G with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName": > I've lost track of whether [the argument is that] mutt should put a > 'name="*"' parameter on the Content-Type: header or [the complaint is > that] mutt expects such a parameter. It seems t

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

Hi, On Thu, Mar 09 2000 21:16:32 +0100 wrote Stefan `Sec` Zehl with subject "Re: Reply to full name from alias list": > Does this patch: > http://sec.42.org/mutt/patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1 > > | patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1: > | extends reverse_alias to also fix the Realnames in outg

Re: attachments appear as NoName

Hi, On Thu, Mar 09 2000 10:10:13 + wrote Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName": > Here you're comparing a text/plain attachment produced by mutt with an > application/msword attachment produced by some by some other MUA. I didn't pay attention to the different

Re: attachments appear as NoName

Hi there, On Wed, Mar 08 2000 09:07:22 +0100 wrote Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName": > > If these attachments do not have a Content-Disposition filename= > > field, this would appear correct. [...] > > For instance, a recent message sent to mut

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

Hi, On Wed, Mar 08 2000 06:18:58 -0500 wrote David T-G with subject "Re: Reply to full name from alias list": > % I was close to ask the same question. Mutt doesn't have this feature > > I asked exactly this question, in fact, on 2000Feb08 but got absolutely > no response. You guys must have b

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

Hi, On Wed, Mar 08 2000 14:02:23 +0530 wrote Mrinal Kalakrishnan with subject "Reply to full name from alias list": > I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say > this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become > the whole name and address from my al