On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:49:25 +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mostly I'm only interested in the message text body, not possibly large
> attachments. Is it possible to configure mutt to not fetch the whole
> message, but only the text part, so that opening multi-megabyte message
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 11:53:50 -0500, X Tec wrote:
...
> ---Finally, on IMAP, different email providers seem to have totally
> different ways to specify their subfolders for the variables $sent,
> $drafts...: "INBOX.sent", "[Gmail]/Sent Mail", etc. Then how am I suppose
> to find out which syntax
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 15:26:47 -0400, Christopher Conforti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using mutt for a bit now. I really like it, because it's
> vastly more efficient than the GUI MUA I was using before and so much
> more configurable; there are a LOT of options! It seems here lately I
> lea
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 08:32:54 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 18:41:33 -0400, Chuck Martin wrote:
...
> > alternates "^jeffpc(\\+.*)?@...$"
> >
> > If you have the same username at
> > multiple domains, you might b
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 18:41:33 -0400, Chuck Martin wrote:
...
> That would mean, applying the
> differences I have to your example:
>
> alternates "^jeffpc(\\+.*)?@...$"
>
> with your domain replacing the "...".
Somehow that doesn't look as menacing as what I tried. Thanks for the info
ab
Hello,
I started more heavily relying on plus addressing (or whatever the official
name for the feature is) to separate out a few things. Unfortunately, it
means that reverse_name=yes is failing more and more often. I'd like it to
set the from address to the same address (with the +foo), but I'm
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 14:05:38 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:43:17PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >And as I said, all is working fine, i.e. the mails get sent fine, the
> >only problem is this message spilt out by mutt about mail not sent.
> >
> >I will nail this
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 18:55:51 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
...
> On Unix systems, at least
> for most file systems, the size of a directory is the space occupied
> by the blocks needed to hold the internal representation of the
> listing of the directory...
Yes, the size on directories is essenti
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 16:23:03 -0400, Logan Rathbone wrote:
...
> Another way of potentially achieving this may be to think outside the
> box -- or outside the index, in this case.
>
> Why not set up the MTA to deliver mail into a mailbox called "Today" and
> set up a daily cronjob to do furth
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 00:01:18 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> Oops, if I'd seen this message before I sent my last post, I probably
> wouldn't have bothered to post it.
>
> That said, I will take issue with the notion that mbox is a terrible
> format: It isn't. It does, however, have usage patte
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 23:25:18 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:37:50AM +0200, Sebastian Stein wrote:
...
> > When I open a folder, I can mark a mail as new. How does mutt keep track of
> > this flag? Is this stored inside mbox file?
>
> Yes. It's stored in a message head
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:37:50 +0200, Sebastian Stein wrote:
> Kevin J. McCarthy [200716 18:18]:
> > If the access time is earlier than the modification time, it notifies for
> > new mail.
>
> Wow, what a bad algorithm.
It is a super cheap test with zero storage overhead.
> I mean, this was p
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:00:52 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:20:22PM +0100, isdtor wrote:
> >Two questions remain now. The first, when using mutt with gpgme, are
> >any of the gpg/gpg/certificate/smime related configuration variables
> >still relevant? And if so,
13 matches
Mail list logo
