On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
> What about
> source `colorset.sh`
Where is colorset.sh available?
-Hanspeter
On Oct 15 at 13:42, Jose Romildo Malaquias spoke:
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to specify more than one set of colors
> to be used by mutt? The color sets would be
> selected according to the terminal colors. This way
> I could use an appropriate set of colors with a
> light backgound terminal,
Hello,
it seems to me setting hostname has no effect when using bounce.
I expect hostname is what goes into the Resent-Message-Id: and the
Received: entry. Or am I wrong?
I have set hostname unconditionally.
Is hostname superseded by some other setting?
-Hanspeter
Hello,
is there a hook based on the bounce target?
Or is there a `bounce target pattern' for send-hook?
It seems to me that ~A in a send-hook has no effect with bounce.
-Hanspeter
On Oct 13 at 18:49, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
> Write a shellscript, which outputs the info you want (depending on
> whatever you want) and source it with 'source "pathtoscript"|'.
Ok. Thank you.
-Hanspeter
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
> hostname = `hostname`
> Is it what you want ?
No. I want something like this:
if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
set hostname=host2
fi
It should also affect the domain in the envelope when using bounce.
-Hanspeter
Hello,
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
-Hanspeter
On Oct 05 at 13:25, Thomas Dickey spoke:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr/opt/ncurses-5.2
Sorry I was referring to the configuration of ncurses.
> export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/opt/ncurses-5.2/inc
On Oct 05 at 12:29, Thomas Dickey spoke:
> but what does the output of the configure script look like? For example,
> the related section when I configure:
>
> checking for ispell... /usr/bin/ispell
> checking for initscr in -lncurses... yes
> checking for ncurses.h... yes
> checking for star
On Oct 01 at 16:15, Thomas Dickey spoke:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> >
> > If I could manage to build a mutt linked against an standard
> > ncurses5.x then shoud there be a working use_default_colors()
> > available?
>
&g
On Oct 03 at 17:02, Will Yardley spoke:
> Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
>
> As a mutt-user (and someone without a whole lot of time on Usenet), I
> found slrn pretty easy to adapt to... and it has really good scoring as
> well.
>
On Oct 03 at 22:53, Sven Guckes spoke:
> yes. there are are several news services which offer an email gateway.
Any suggestions?
-Hanspeter
On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke:
> if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
> the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers?
Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
-Hanspeter
On Oct 03 at 10:20, Kurt Lieber spoke:
> He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs used instead of
> Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be configured to add those *in
> addition to* the normal Reply-To header. IMO, perfectly on topic and a
> subject which I'm interested in
On Oct 02 at 21:08, Will Yardley spoke:
[snipping a lot]
> Most mail clients either blindly honor Reply-To: OR give the user an
> option (or allow you to configure it either way).
>
> > And maybe there are also mailers which expect another header rather
> > than Reply-To. So if I knew those I
On Oct 01 at 17:32, Will Yardley spoke:
> Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all
> the headers of their email messages and there are precious few mail
It is probably up to the *MUA* rather than to people to see the
Reply-To header.
As of Mutt it can be told
On Oct 01 at 06:06, Thomas E. Dickey spoke:
> NetBSD has a strong not-invented-here faction, which is busily porting
> chunks of ncurses into their native BSD curses. It's not complete, but
> the latest version reportedly has use_default_colors(). If the entrypoint
> exists, but does not work
On Oct 01 at 01:13, Sven Guckes spoke:
> * Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]:
> > are there alternative headers to Reply-To:
> > and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs?
>
> "we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."
On Sep 27 at 11:28, Chris Green spoke:
> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color
Mutt (ncurses?) on NetBsd doesn't like this either.
If you have a light background you might choose `brightwhite'
instead. Then you might get bright gray.
-Hanspeter
Hello,
Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like
Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To?
(Probably some users configure their mailers to ignore such
headers.)
-Hanspeter
Hello,
are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To:
used by other MUAs?
-Hanspeter
On Sep 17 at 15:43, Brett Sanger spoke:
> Mutt FAQ:
> Mutt leaves files called "mutt.host.123.234~" or "mutt.host.123.234.bak"
> behind it!
>
> This is your editor, not Mutt. It is probably a good idea to modify your
> editor so it won't create backup files for your mails. If you use Emacs,
Hello,
under certain circumstances after sending messages there appear
backup files of mutt in /tmp which name is mutt-host-pid-x.bak.
I have ispell set to `ispell -x' to tell ispell not to keep a backup
copy.
How can I make mutt to delete these files?
-Hanspeter
On Apr 10 at 16:52, Hanspeter Roth spoke:
> Hello,
>
> how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
> I want to do it manually if at all.
pgp_verify_sig
Hello,
how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
I want to do it manually if at all.
-Hanspeter
On Mar 27 at 04:41, Markus Hubig spoke:
> > > > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l,
> > > > something like:
> > > >
> > > > send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l'
> > > >
> > > > The ~l won't be substituted in my_hdr. Is there some means to achieve
> > > > this?
>
>
On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke:
>
> Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I
> create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also
> create folder-hooks to set Reply-To: to the list address. Works.
Good idea. I probably should do the same.
On Mar 26 at 17:56, Simon White spoke:
> 26-Mar-02 at 18:51, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > You are assuming that /everybody/ is using Mutt with mailing lists.
> > I do use Mutt and I do use L.
> > But should I expect everybody to switch to Mutt?
> >
On Mar 26 at 17:38, Simon White spoke:
>
> If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply
> just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your
> muttrc.
>
> The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply
> to the list only.
On Mar 26 at 17:34, Roman Neuhauser spoke:
> > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:57:27 +0100
> > Subject: substituing ~l in send-hook
> >
> > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l,
> > something like:
> >
> > send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l'
> >
> > The ~l won't be substi
On Mar 03 at 16:42, Adam Byrtek spoke:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:02:45PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > If you mark an attachment with the unlink flag, then you are telling
> > Mutt that your file has the same disposition as any of its temp files.
>
> Yes, I fully understand that now... B
On Feb 25 at 23:42, Adam Byrtek spoke:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > And I think people don't want to read the _whole_ manual before start
> > using Mutt.
>
> Hey, I've read the whole manual, but I still missed it :)
Wow
On Feb 23 at 17:48, Adam Byrtek spoke:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 06:31:56PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > Maybe you hit `u' which toggles the unlink flag. This is displayed
>
> Yes, it is possible. I wanted to find keystroke to unattach it
> (without unlinking of c
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:25:37PM +0100, Adam Byrtek wrote:
>
> Help! I was composing a new msg today and I wanted to inlude one of my
> mailboxes as an attachment. I attached the file, and them resigned,
> pressing q and no to postpone question, and I've found that my whole
> attached mailbox w
I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l,
something like:
send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l'
The ~l won't be substituted in my_hdr. Is there some means to achieve
this?
-Hanspeter
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
-Hanspeter
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
-Hanspeter
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:44:17PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> ...and then Hanspeter Roth said...
>
> % Maybe once when I think I can't explore anymore usefull in mutt, I
> % might look at pine.
>
> Many here would grin widely at that and tell you the day wi
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:13:07AM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Try this:
> send-hook . 'set record=+sent'
I already tried this. It seems only to be effective at the To:
prompt at the initial send-menu if autoedit is unset.
But it seems to have no effect in the compose menu.
Aliases are reeval
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:14:10AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
>
> I know, pine is not very robust, but I'm pretty sure if you configure it
> properly, it can display the time the message arrived if it arrived
> today, the day of the week it arrived if it arrived less than a week
> ago, and t
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:09:14AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Hanspeter Roth spake thus:
> > Is it possible to have lines with different index_formats in the
> > index? I would like to display a different date format for messages
> > sent within the la
Is it possible to have lines with different index_formats in the
index? I would like to display a different date format for messages
sent within the last 24 hours.
I tried:
folder-hook . \
'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4l) %s"'
message-hook '~d <1d' \
'set index_format="%4C %
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:46:32PM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Don't you have to define a default hook in the config file before you
> call the send-hook so that mutt knows what it needs to look at first?
I have:
set default_hook="~t %s"
send-hook . set record=+sent
Is there another defaul
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:26:51PM +0700, budsz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to change directory index like "tree" in mutt, I mean like this:
>
> message1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
>---
> message2| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> message3 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on.
>
> I'
By default the matched line is just glued at the top.
Is there something like a target line for the search function in the
builtin pager? (Something like -j for `less'?)
-Hanspeter
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:03:19PM +0200, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> > edit_headers set.
>
> > This is a bug, isn't it?
>
> Why should it be considered a bug?
It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
edit_headers set.
Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
have any effect.
This is a bug, isn't it?
-Hanspeter
Hello
in an earlier version of Mutt I could set `my_hdr From:' which
also affected the From envelop.
This doesn't seem to work anymore.
Is there another means to set the From envelop?
-Hanspeter
--
48 matches
Mail list logo
