Why does mutt ask for a GPG key to use

When I send a GPG-encrypted mail to, say "Foo Bar ", and there is a public key for that address in the GPG keyring, mutt still asks for a key to use for encryption. Can I tell mutt to use the key matching the receiver address automatically? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt

unsubscribe

approve RVyQ2s unsubscribe mutt-users v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Re: List reply + group reply combined

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:22:53PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 04.02.16 12:13, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:51:54PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > > OK, as is, "To:" becomes the sender of the post to which we're replying,

Re: List reply + group reply combined

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:51:54PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 04.02.16 11:24, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On some mailing lists you're expected to keep people on CC, for > > example the gcc lists. So I need kind of a combination of a list > > reply and a grou

List reply + group reply combined

put in another way: In a group reply, if there is at least one mailing list in the recipient list, put all of them in the "To:" header and stick all non-list-recipients into the "CC:" header. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany

Re: Never CC sender

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:14:42PM +0300, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote: > *** Dominik Vogt [Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:08:15 +0100]: > >When using group-reply or list-reply the sender address should > >never be included in the CC header (because I already save a copy > >of all out

Never CC sender

When using group-reply or list-reply the sender address should never be included in the CC header (because I already save a copy of all outgoing messages in the inbox). I cannot figure out how to enforce this from the manual. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany

Sender string of a mailing list

quot;Cc" or "To" without losing the other benefits of %L in the index_format? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt

Have to press a key on startup

Whenever I start mutt, it forces me to press a key before it actually displays the mailbox. ("Press any key to continue..."). Adding set wait_key=no to ~/.muttrc does not help. Even this does not help: $ rm ~/.muttrc $ sudo rm /etc/Muttrc $ sudo touch /etc/Muttrc $ mutt -F /dev/null

Re: bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

IL PROTECTED]): snip -- Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline X-From-Line: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 09 22:48:30 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:

Re: bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

What else could have changed to cause my troubles? BTW, I'd like to setup my mail system to send external mails over a different server than internal ones (because our servers are blacklisted). What mailer would you recommend (exim, sendmail, postfix, ...?) I'm currently using exim. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe

Re: bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:17:28PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > At 13:30 +0200 11 Jul 2002, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > > > Not that I recall. It's always pretty much just resubmitted

Re: bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

w envelope recipients. Shouldn't it add a "Resend-To:" header? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe

Re: bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > At 17:19 +0200 10 Jul 2002, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Problem: With said mutt release I can't bounce messages anymore. > > > Actually, the message *is* bounced, but unlike earlier rele

bouncing w/ mutt-1.3.28i

talling an older mutt version)? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ P.S.: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list (and all my previous attempts to subscribe failed). -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe

Re: mutt paints over background image

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 02:41:24PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:25:51AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > &

Re: mutt paints over background image

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:25:51AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > # Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /usr/lib/terminfo/r/rxvt > > > rxvt|rxvt terminal emulator (X Window System), > > > am,

Re: mutt paints over background image

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:11:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:37:22AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > I have been using mutt in an rxvt window with a background xp

Re: mutt paints over background image

> darren chamberlain wrote: > Quoting Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27 Feb-02 08:22]: > > I have been using mutt in an rxvt window with a background xpm > > for a long time, using the version from the SuSE distribution > > withouth compilling myself. Since SuS

Re: mutt paints over background image

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:37:22AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > I have been using mutt in an rxvt window with a background xpm > > for a long time, using the version from the SuSE distribution > > withouth compilling

mutt paints over background image

vs. ncurses. The older versions were using ncurses and the new ones are compiles with slang. Is there any way to get back my background image without having to compile mutt myself? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D

Re: redirecting mail to mailboxes

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > On 09.07.2001 10:31:16 Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > I strongly disagree. Of course it does not make sense to > > re-implement procmail in mutt. But the average user does not need > > 5 percent of procmai

Re: redirecting mail to mailboxes

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:27:01PM +0100, John Arundel wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:58:06PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > - I want to do xyz. > > - My mail client can't do it. > > See the Mutt FAQ: > > "How can I make Mutt use a SMTP server

Re: redirecting mail to mailboxes

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:51:19AM +0100, John Arundel wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I strongly disagree. > > That's your privilege, of course. > > > Of course it does not make sense to > > re-implement procmail

Re: redirecting mail to mailboxes

to have some mail filtering but are unable to set up with mutt. I believe this is one of the most common features people expect from their mail client - and I don't mean UNIX freaks but just an office user like our secretary. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: redirecting mail to mailboxes

02:10:14PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I have a single mail account where I get several kinds of mails. > > Some are from mailing lists, some are company internal and some > > are from various services on our server which I administrate. > > Since the server generates

redirecting mail to mailboxes

fetchmail? I am using mutt-1.3.12i. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ P.S.: please CC me, I'm not on the mailing list. -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20

Disabling APOP?

uot;/var/mail" SHAREDIR="/usr/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" -MIXMASTER --------- Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20

how to reply to cc addresses?

What is the easiest way to reply to the sender and all cc'ed addresses at once with mutt? THere must be a simpler method than cut-and-paste. Bye Dominik ^_^ P.S.: Please cc me, I'm not on the list. -- Dominik Vogt, Agilent Technologies, Dept. BVS Herrenberger Str.130, 71034

mangling a from header

t;my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" send-hook "^ *[mM]utt" "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ... This efficiently takes care of mailing list mail. But now I'd like to do the same if I just 'r'eply to list mail not 'L'ist reply. Can this be d

Re: delete key; forwarding attachments

On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 03:25:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 12:10:44PM -0700, Rene Tio wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:58:39AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >

delete key; forwarding attachments

strips the attachment. Can anybody help me solve these problems? Bye Dominik ^_^ P.S.: Please CC men, I'm not on the list. -- Dominik Vogt, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Dept. BVS Herrenberger Str.130, 71034 Boeblingen, Germany phone: 07031/14-4596, fax: 07031/14-3883, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

printing c sources with mutt?

ase cc me on replies, I'm not on the list. -- Dominik Vogt, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Dept. BVS Herrenberger Str.130, 71034 Boeblingen, Germany phone: 07031/14-4596, fax: 07031/14-3883, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

0.95 running very slow

S SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" SHAREDIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" -ISPELL Bye Dominik ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Dept. BVS Herrenberger Str.130, 71034 Boeblingen, Germany phone: 07031/14-4596, fax: 07031/14-3883, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

trouble with send-hook

s as if there is already some trash in the input buffer. Sometimes I don't get the '@' but a couple of random characters and I have to hit Backspace several times. This problem occurs only on my HP-UX machine (712/60). No problem on various Linux machines at all. Any hints? Is ther