Hello.
On Tue 2002-10-01 at 14:23:03 -0700, you wrote
> --- Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > > I usually work with mail on the local machine, but
> > > sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no
> > > problem logging on with "c{user@serv
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Be sure to u
Hi.
On Tue 2002-09-17 at 01:32:22 -0700, Jeremy Lin wrote:
[...]
> So how do people right now search for multiple occurences of a pattern
> anyway?
By pressing 'n', like in 'less'. :-)
Never noticed that re-searching for the same pattern does not find the
next match, like in less, because I nev
Hi.
Just minor addition, else, I think this has been discussed quite
thourougly now.
On Sat 2002-07-06 at 11:07:53 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
> > On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > > I misundersto
Hi.
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
> I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
> pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.
How?
> > I do not think so. The work
Hi.
On Thu 2002-06-20 at 16:56:24 +1000, Scott Howard wrote:
>
> I'm fairly certain this isn't possible, but...
>
> Our helpdesk system sends out emails every time a task/case/request is
> created/updated/closed/etc.
>
> These take the form of something like :
>
> 17 + Jun 17 Helpdesk (
Hello.
On Wed 2002-06-12 at 10:37:21 -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
[...]
> I think what i'll do is filter probable spam as if it were just regular mail
> and write a script that i can call on each piece of spam. The script will
> count the number of bytes in the message (call it N) and then look t
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 23:07:26 -0400, Mike Arrison wrote:
> Mutters,
> I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
> use folder hooks to "set from", "my_hdr From", and "my_hdr Reply-To".
> This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
> bef
Hi.
On Tue 2002-06-04 at 00:50:01 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> That is sort of ``batch'', I guess. I miss one-by-one
> instead of all-at-once. It would be nice if I could tag
> messages I want to reply to so that I can answer each
> individual mail instead of a mass reply...
Maybe I complet
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
> >> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
> >
Hi.
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
[...]
> I was just wondering -- I tried tagging some collapsed threads, and then
> pressing ;N. I was just guessing, but I guessed it right: it marks the
> tagged articles (un)read...
>
> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really
Hello.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:31:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:19:47 +0200, Johannes Berth wrote:
[...]
> > Apart from that, you might want to Postpone the Mail.
>
> This is what I often do.
Since I discovered attach-mail (usually 'A'), I do not postpone/C
12 matches
Mail list logo
