Thank you Monte and Nathan reverse_name does what i wanted.
> p.s. You didn't say what exactly happened when you tried the reply-hook
> commands you listed, but I'm guessing this sentence from the Mutt manual
> explains why they didn't do as you hoped:
>
> Note: reply-hooks are matched before t
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:24:58AM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:05:16AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> > >On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:26PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > >>On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:09:07
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:24:58AM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> O.K. I did have resolve unset and as I play with the settings I see that
> I get the behavior I want when deleting messages however when I flag a
> message I did not want the cursor to move down which is why I unset
> resolve.
Ah...
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:05:16AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:26PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:09:07PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> >>> For a long time I've been using th
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:53:27AM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:26PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:09:07PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> For a long time I've been using this Mutt macro:
>
> macro index D ""
Unless I'm very confused, this is the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:26PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:09:07PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> > For a long time I've been using this Mutt macro:
> >
> > macro index D ""
>
> Unless I'm very confused, this is the default behavior of the 'd' key.
> You don't need a
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:01:11 +0200, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
> i have spent over an hour on a *really* simple issue and experimented wildly
> but i can't find just the right spot in the manual or elsewhere. please give
> me a hint on tfm:
>
> i have addresses "o...@web.de" and "t...@web.de".
>
$wrap wraps lines at the specified characters.
$smart_wrap wraps lines at word boundary. But only if the lines are
longer than screen width, not when they are longer than $wrap.
Is there a way for a really smart wrap, as in wrap text at $wrap
characters, but if a word exceeds $wrap characters
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:01:11PM +0200, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
> when replying to mails sent to my adress "t...@web.de" i want the from-header
> to show
> "t...@web.de" not "o...@web.de".
set from="o...@web.de"
alternates t...@web\.de
set reverse_name
Does that work?
Dear All,
i have spent over an hour on a *really* simple issue and experimented wildly
but i can't find just the right spot in the manual or elsewhere. please give
me a hint on tfm:
i have addresses "o...@web.de" and "t...@web.de".
i have
set from="o...@web.de"
send-hook . 'set from="o...@web.d
10 matches
Mail list logo
