Re: Anyone else having trouble with function keys and the latest tip

2009-07-07 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * John J. Foster wrote: > > > All of my function keys stopped working with the latest tip. > > Not here. Any bindings, any example? With command+F1 I get the manual as > expected. > This was pretty much self-inflicted. I've

Re: Save lots of attachments in one go - possible?

2009-07-07 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:58:41PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:52:31PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go? > > > > E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination > > would have to be a directory and all the

Re: Save lots of attachments in one go - possible?

2009-07-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:52:31PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go? > > E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination > would have to be a directory and all the attachments would get their > default name but I don't see this as a bi

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:43:56AM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:06:23PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > >Please see if this example and text above it helps you: > > > > http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#ex-recips > > When was this added? It was added on Oct. 2nd, 1998

Save lots of attachments in one go - possible?

2009-07-07 Thread Chris G
Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go? E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination would have to be a directory and all the attachments would get their default name but I don't see this as a big issue. -- Chris Green

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tuesday, July 7 at 02:12 PM, quoth Ed Blackman: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:43:59PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 7 at 11:43 AM, quoth Ed Blackman: >>> send-hook "~t joe@" set pgp_autoencrypt=yes # ... >> >> I think you probabl

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Ed Blackman
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:43:59PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, July 7 at 11:43 AM, quoth Ed Blackman: send-hook "~t joe@" set pgp_autoencrypt=yes # ... I think you probably want $crypt_autoencrypt instead of pgp_*. I think it must have changed in a recent version that you have an

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tuesday, July 7 at 11:43 AM, quoth Ed Blackman: > send-hook "~t joe@" set pgp_autoencrypt=yes # ... I think you probably want $crypt_autoencrypt instead of pgp_*. > This autoencrypts whenever I email Joe directly (what I want) and > when I ema

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Ed Blackman
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:06:23PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Please see if this example and text above it helps you: http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#ex-recips When was this added? I'm using Mutt 1.5.17+20080114 (Ubuntu Hardy), and have a similar request. I usually PGP sign emails

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Noah Slater wrote: Please see if this example and text above it helps you: http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#ex-recips If I understand you right (mail _only_ to you: no sig, mail you and other in the recips: sig), then this may work (untested): > send-hook .* "source

Re: Anyone else having trouble with function keys and the latest tip

2009-07-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * John J. Foster wrote: > All of my function keys stopped working with the latest tip. Not here. Any bindings, any example? With command+F1 I get the manual as expected. > Terminal.app > OSX 10.5.7 - hasn't been updated for over a week. Same here. Rocco pgplgQOi1krMS.pgp Description: PG