Re: Replying to a specific message

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 27 at 06:10 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R: >> The only "parsing" that the pattern parser needs to do is break up >> the user-input string into "logical parts" of the form (~i EXPR), >> (~s EXPR), etc., and then

Re: Replying to a specific message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, August 27 at 06:10 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R: > The only "parsing" that the pattern parser needs to do is break up > the user-input string into "logical parts" of the form (~i EXPR), > (~s EXPR), etc., and then each corresponding part can

Re: Replying to a specific message

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 26 at 11:46 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R: >>> Skip the escaping, and just use quotes: >>> >>> mutt -e "push '~i "$MID"'" $@ >>> >>> AFAIK quote characters aren't allowed in Message-IDs. >> >> That's probabl

Keeping two copies of sent messages

Hi! Is it possible to save two copies of sent messages? The idea is to have a copy of sent messages depending on the recipient, and another copy depending on the account sent. This is what I have so far: 1.- A macro sources different identities, and the sourced file sets the mailbox depending o

Re: Automatically fill TO: based on folder

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:58:11PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > An easy way to set the FCC to whatever the current folder is would be: > > folder-hook . 'set record=^' It works ... Interesting ... I had a version of that, but with "^" instead of the plain ^, and it was commented out for not

mutt configuration for windows

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello mutt users, I have Mutt pretty well configured in Linux using my gmail with imap/remote folders and learned a lot about that almost eliminating the need to ever log into the gmail web interface. I found mutt for windows and downloaded that since

Re: Automatically fill TO: based on folder

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, August 27 at 10:36 AM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Speaking of similar things, I see a lot of macros on this list, and > I have not used them yet. I wanted to set Fcc: to the folder I am > mailing from, and tried doing this for each fol

Re: Automatically fill TO: based on folder

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > Yes. Here's an example of what I do so that I can address messages > to the mailing list corresponding to the folder I'm in by typing > 'M': > >folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-users \ > 'macro index,pager M "mutt-users^M^M"

Re: Automatically fill TO: based on folder

On 2008-08-27, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > When creating a new message I would like mutt to fill the TO: field > based on the directory in which I am curretly in. > > Say I'm in > > Familly/joe > > (maildir format) > > and I press m, mutt should put joe's address in the TO

Re: how to interrupt

Hi, * bill lam wrote: Some email contains attachment of size around 3 to 6 MB. Actually I had downloaded them but apparently the local cache doesn't work. So the "hang" is actually expected? What did you try to make the local cache work? It should be just setting $message_cachedir should do.

Re: how to interrupt

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Is there progress in the mean time? How long does it take? Can you > exclude networking problems of any kind? > > Currently there's no way to interrupt, though IIRC there's a enhancement > request to support it for mutt 2.0. > > Rocco Thank Rocco and K

Re: extract header from current message (to pass to shell)?

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:44:41PM +0100, Marianne Promberger wrote: > Non-mutt related question in case someone with server experience would > like to comment: > > I'm not directly rsyncing up, but am calling a shell script that first > does one ping to see whether I can reach the server. Would i

Re: extract header from current message (to pass to shell)?

Thanks guys, I wasn't quite sure how to integrate details of Patrick's procmailrc suggestions, as I'm using mutt locally (combined with offlineimap) and have procmail filter remotely on the server. However, I now do use a mutt macro & procmail combo, like this: in ~/.muttrc: macro index "I" "/u

Re: Automatically fill TO: based on folder

* steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-27 14:37]: > Hi all, > > When creating a new message I would like mutt to fill the TO: field > based on the directory in which I am curretly in. > > Say I'm in > > Familly/joe > > (maildir format) > > and I press m, mutt should put joe's address in the TO

Automatically fill TO: based on folder

Hi all, When creating a new message I would like mutt to fill the TO: field based on the directory in which I am curretly in. Say I'm in Familly/joe (maildir format) and I press m, mutt should put joe's address in the TO: field. Is this possible? If yes how can I achieve this? Thanks in ad