On 2007-10-14, Felix 'buebo' Kakrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Am 13.10.07 19:12 schrieb Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > To see what mutt receives when you type a key or key combination,
> > execute this in mutt:
> >
> >:exec what-key
>
> This does only seem to work when I s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-14-07 12:43]:
> Am 2007-10-09 21:06:32, schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> > Do you have something afterwards altering $MAILDIR,
> > AND
> > your procmail *path* variables should be quoted:
>
> I am usung procmail
Am 2007-10-10 15:29:08, schrieb Rem P Roberti:
> Is it possible to use curly braces to nest conditions? For
> example, there are two addresses that can be used for the FreeBSD
> mailing list to which I subscribe, and I would like to incorporate them both
> into the same
> recipe.
>
> Rem
>
--
Am 2007-10-09 21:19:54, schrieb Kyle Wheeler:
> On Tuesday, October 9 at 04:37 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> > My thanks again to both of you. Creating my .procmailrc recipe in
> > the manner suggested by Joseph did the trick. What I don't
> > understand is that since the variable MAILDIR=$HOME/M
Hello Patrick,
Am 2007-10-09 21:06:32, schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> Do you have something afterwards altering $MAILDIR,
> AND
> your procmail *path* variables should be quoted:
I am usung procmail since ober 8 years and have never quoted it.
> SHELL="/bin/bash"
> SPOOL="/var/spool/mail"
> MAILDI
Am 2007-10-09 16:06:31, schrieb Rem P Roberti:
>
> Back at it (Kyle, are you out there?). I've been trying to set up
> individual mailboxes for folks I receive mail from frequently. I
> create the mailbox in .muttrc (mailboxes $HOME/Mail/user), and then a recipe
> like this in
> .procmailrc:
>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:10:45PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > But you're asking for "proof that it reached us as the recipient" for
> > multiple recipients apparently, with a *single* acknowledgement.
> > That's just not possible
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
No. You get me wrong, repeatedly. I'm asking for a "proof" that
a message has reached a single role. It does not matter if more then one
person can actually be the role.
Hm, do you mean, it is enough for you if the last server
Hello,
Am 13.10.07 19:12 schrieb Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To see what mutt receives when you type a key or key combination,
> execute this in mutt:
>
>:exec what-key
This does only seem to work when I set $LANG to something that is not UTF-8,
per default $LANG is de_DE.UTF-8 on my
