I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with
command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I
thought I had the right syntax
[kosuke@sumida mutt-1.4]$ patch -p1 < patch-1.4.trash.txt
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the w
Hi,
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-08 23:23]:
>I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
>as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
>automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt
>also gives you the option of sp
I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt
also gives you the option of specifying which format new folders are
set up in, so I thought
Hi,
* Andre Berger [02-06-08 16:45:04 +0200] wrote:
> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> 2002-06-08 09:34 -0400:
> My uudecode is out of date, and I have trouble compiling a
> new one. As I plan to upgrade to Debian 3.0 in the near
> future, I didn't bother.
> andre@mir:~$ uudecode -v
>
Hi,
* Kurt Hindenburg [02-06-08 17:15:07 +0200] wrote:
> I would like to bind 'r' to 'list-reply' when the message
> is from a mailing list I'm subscribed to. A catch-all
> one command would be nice.
> # Hmm, don't think so... ~l is not a folder
> folder-hook "~l" "bind index r list-reply"
Andre,
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 09:55:04AM -0400, Andre Berger wrote:
> Talking about abook, is there a way to extract the snailmail address
> of certain user for use in shell srcipts and the like?
> -Andre
Its funny, but I don't think there is a way currently. That's a good
feature requ
I would like to bind 'r' to 'list-reply' when the message is from a
mailing list I'm subscribed to. A catch-all one command would be nice.
~l message is addressed to a known mailing list
Should I use message-hook, folder-hook or what?
# Hmm, don't think so... ~l is
* Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-06-08 10:23 -0400:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:39:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
[on archiving]
> Does anyone keep everything from a list like debian-user on their
> hard-drive to have a local archive? I can imagine doing something
> like that, because
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-06-08 09:34 -0400:
> Hi,
>=20
> * Andre Berger [02-06-08 08:45:05 +0200] wrote:
>=20
> > It did. Though my uudecode doesn'
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:39:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> I've set Procmail to sort every mailing list into a different folder,
> thus mutt-users goes to =mutt-users. And mutt-dev goes to =mutt-dev.
> And all debian-* lists are sorted the same way, too. Then I have some
> local mailboxes, l
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-06-06 16:39 -0400:
> Kevin,
>
> > I'm enjoying using Mutt, although mangling the messages, but
> > am wondering whether there is a good console type address
> > book to use with it?
>
> I agree that abook is good. In fact, it is the first project
Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The goa-head.org mail starts bouncing, it gets unsubbed ...
> I forgot to mention this: goa-head.org is just a redirect to my "real"
> email address - a friend of mine put up this redirecting just because I
> think, that goa-head
Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The goa-head.org mail starts bouncing, it gets unsubbed ...
I forgot to mention this: goa-head.org is just a redirect to my "real"
email address - a friend of mine put up this redirecting just because I
think, that goa-head.org is much cooler than the r
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Kevin Coyner said...
>> I'm enjoying using Mutt, although mangling the messages, but
>> am wondering whether there is a good console type address
>> book to use with it?
>
> 1) I don't use it, but I hear that abook is pretty good.
I use it, and
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
>> to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
>> occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
>> emai
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:31:43PM +0200, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
> > 3) no Muttprint or functional equivalent;
>
> in .muttrc
>
> set print_command=$HOME/bin/print
>
> $ cat ~/bin/print
> #!/bin/sh
> cat > .printout
> lpr -S -P .printout
>
> where is a windows print server with lpd enabled
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This is probably a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway because it
>> has been bothering me since I first subscribed to mutt-user. ;-)
>
> Not stupid :-)
Yeah! Didn't someone say, that:
"There is no stupid ques
Hi,
* Andre Berger [02-06-08 08:45:05 +0200] wrote:
> It did. Though my uudecode doesn't support the -c flag. So
> my solution is:
On my system (FreeBSD 4.5-p6) 'uudecode -c' extracts all
parts instead of only the first. I usually don't pass a
filename as an argument since a) there may be multi
18 matches
Mail list logo
