Hi, * Kurt Hindenburg [02-06-08 17:15:07 +0200] wrote: > I would like to bind 'r' to 'list-reply' when the message > is from a mailing list I'm subscribed to. A catch-all > one command would be nice.
> # Hmm, don't think so... ~l is not a folder > folder-hook "~l" "bind index r list-reply" > # Doesn't work > message-hook "~l" "bind index r list-reply" > # Works of course for all messages > bind index r list-reply The problem is that you can define complex patterns but only one command. That means, you can take exactly one action (which may be a list of multiple ones) if a pattern matches. How should mutt decide wether you want to reply to the list or to the author? I don't really know why someone would merge the great different answering functions... Cheers, Rocco
