On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:50:09PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 20:28:12 CEST] wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > > * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote:
> > > > I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want m
On Monday 15 April 2002 22:41, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, try replacing "\n" by "":
-
- macro compose i ":set ispell=..." "..."
Same old thing - a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears to be a freeze of
all Mutt functions.
Cheers,
Brian
Michael Tatge wrote:
> Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround:
>
> > - I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages
> > and subfolders but when I enter a maildir the message index is
>
> Is it possible to read Mailinglist of public folders on a
> Exchange Server with Mutt
I manged to configure my mutt to read my mails from the exchange server, but
unfortunatly i cannot Browse lower than one level into the public folders.
I am running:
Debian Linux woddy kernel 2.4.7 with ima
Hi,
* Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 20:28:12 CEST] wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote:
> > > I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode
> > > message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I
Hi,
* Alain Bench [04/15/02 21:31:06 CEST] wrote:
> On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 1:15:41 AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > So a message would have to be encoded correctly before handing it over
> > to an SMTP delivery process and should be deliverable without any
> > modifications.
> BTW yo
I recently changed configs - I'm now using fetchmail/procmail/mutt,
and when I compose a message in mutt, I get this message when
I try to send it:
~/.mutt/tmp/mutt-merrill-1234-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
Am I doing something wrong, or have a forgotten something in the
config
Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround:
> - I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages
> and subfolders but when I enter a maildir the message index is
> displayed automatically
This
Hi,
* Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 22:01]:
>begin Thorsten Haude quotation:
>> Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.142]
>> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.8.0)
>> for yooden@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 14 Apr 2002 17:00:25 +0200 (CEST)
>That's a r
begin Will Yardley quotation:
>
> > And I cannot verify this one.
>
> perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list?
Is this list no longer for solving Mutt-related problems?
Or is it just that you think no one else will possibly ever have this
problem, and only the people
begin Thorsten Haude quotation:
>
> Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.142]
> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.8.0)
> for yooden@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 14 Apr 2002 17:00:25 +0200 (CEST)
That's a really old fetchmail, with a lot of known bugs, including
pro
Hello Rocco,
On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 1:15:41 AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey, that's one of mine and guess what... It verifies okay here.
Yes, okay here too now I've corrected effect of my broken deliver.
And It should be also verified by anybody else without
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 20:19]:
> >I cannot verify the first
> And I cannot verify this one.
perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list?
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 20:19]:
>I cannot verify the first
And I cannot verify this one.
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1
msg27201/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP sign
Hi,
* Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 02:15]:
>Can you quote the headers from one you can't verify? I want to see what
>path it's taking to get to you, perhaps there's a broken MTA involved.
Two mails from David, I cannot verify the first, I can verify the
second. I rot13'ed the lead
Hi,
* Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 15:55]:
>> That doesn't sound as if you were a friend of these. Since I saw a few
>> using S/MIME in this list, what might have been their reason? Is
>> S/MIME better established with non-free software?
>We had a discussion in February about this
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote:
> > I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode
> > message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to
> > no in my .muttrc, but mutt
Hi,
* Volker Kuhlmann [04/15/02 08:28:44 CEST] wrote:
> However, when you make fetchmail deliver directly to procmail, fetchmail
> does not generate a "From " line at all, and neither does procmail - big
> barf results. In that case, use fetchmail -> formail | procmail.
,[ ~/.procmailrc ]-
|
begin Nico Schottelius quotation:
>
> I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails.
> I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work.
> I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could
> start to answer the first while recieving th
Hi,
* Brian Durant [04/15/02 17:04:53 CEST] wrote:
> I am new to the list, to Mutt and to Linux.
Welcome. ;-)
[...]
> but when I invoke them in Mutt, I
> get a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears to be a freeze of all Mutt
> functions:
> macro compose i ":set ispell=newsbody-ispell\n" "
Nico Schottelius wrote:
> I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails.
> I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work.
> I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could
> start to answer the first while recieving the last 400.
>
Hello guys!
Please cc-me in answering, I am not subscribed!
I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails.
I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work.
I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could
start to answer the first wh
Hi,
* Mike Schiraldi [04/15/02 15:55:22 CEST] wrote:
[ interesting points ]
Good points, thanks for mentioning.
But in my opinion current problems/difficulties with PGP only
affect people currently using it. So the concept of a web of
trust and the resulting problems only motivate people
curre
First I should note that in spite of the problems I find mutt more
powerful than some GUI beasts that require tons of memory to run.
Thanks to the developers and all people on this list that helped me to
set up mutt.
I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround:
- I'm unable to se
Hello,
I am new to the list, to Mutt and to Linux. I have been studying the manual,
as well as .muttrc files and am close to the point where I feel I actually
can begin to use Mutt on a daily basis ;-) However, I do have a problem. I am
trying to implement the following macros, but when I invo
> That doesn't sound as if you were a friend of these. Since I saw a few
> using S/MIME in this list, what might have been their reason? Is
> S/MIME better established with non-free software?
We had a discussion in February about this. Check out Jeremy's excellent
posts:
http://marc.theaimsgroup
Hi,
* Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote:
> I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode
> message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to
> no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me
> or mutt? (Of course! Mut
Hi,
* David T-G [04/15/02 14:06:08 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote:
> % > gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f
> %
> % Except '--quiet' the same here.
> I don't have --quiet and have --output but am otherwise
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:46]:
% >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote:
% >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]:
% >> >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your
%
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote:
% > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]:
% > >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your
% > >$pgp_verify_command look like?
% > gpg --no-verbose --qu
Volker --
...and then Volker Kuhlmann said...
%
% > Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
% > reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
% > will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
%
% Yes, that hack is very simple:
%
% man formail
* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-15-02 05:45]:
> On Mon 15 Apr 2002 11:45:06 NZST +1200, skidley wrote:
>
> > When I started mutt after a new install I get
> > /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a
> > thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/spool/mail/ and
> >
Hi!
I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode
message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to
no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me
or mutt? (Of course! Mutt can't be wrong, I know! :-)
Thank
Patrik.
msg27182
> Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
> reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
> will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
Yes, that hack is very simple:
man formail
man procmail
Splitting up a single file which contains concaten
On Mon 15 Apr 2002 11:45:06 NZST +1200, skidley wrote:
> When I started mutt after a new install I get
> /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a
> thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/spool/mail/ and
> downloaded my pop messages and still when I run mutt I get
> /var/sp
35 matches
Mail list logo
