* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
> well, I had tried to delete
> those lines with sed pattern
> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
> but it did not work.
>
> however, using the
> following sed pattern
> makes them go away:
> /-- .* --/d
>
> I'll have to find out why the
> first pattern did
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a better solution to keep the whole sent-mail-folder
> encrypted to using the open/close-hook-thingies in the
> compressed-folders-patch?
>
> Then the security issues with having all external encrypted mail
> being encrypted to self wil
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 03:39]:
> On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > [-- Attachment #2 --]
> > [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
> >
> > that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachment).
> > is there
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:20:56AM +1100, David Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote:
>
> >
> > Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if
> > anyone else has solved this problem...
> >
>
> The way I got around this problem was to put "encrypt-to " i
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
> If not, you could strip them with procmail.
Oh, so it's ok to strip sigs with procmail, but not headers? :P
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa'
* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM):
> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the
like <-- sorry, couldn't resist :P
--
timothy lupfer
http://sadlittleboy.com
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> [-- Attachment #2 --]
> [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
>
> [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
>
> that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachm
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:37:11AM +0100:
>
> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
Do you still want to verify the sigs, or not?
If not, you could strip them with procmail.
msg26333/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP si
now, here's the situation:
when the current message has a pgp sig and "pgp_verify_sig" is set
the mutt will show an error message iwhich is something like this:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Mar 28 03:29:50 2002) --]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is signed -
begin quoting what Ricardo SIGNES said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:40:44PM -0500:
>
> Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and
> configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution.
You're wrong.
msg26331/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 01:17]:
> > i find it bad by design that "message-hook" does
> > not have an matching "unmessage-hook" command.
> There's really no difference between 'unmessage-hook',
> 'unsend-hook', 'unfoo-hook', etc. vs. 'unhook message-hook', etc.
> It could b
* On 2002.03.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> >
> > $ TIMEFMT="%D" ./timediff "4/6/67" "3/28/02"
> > Difference is 11773.96 days.
> Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong.
> 19
Here's a short (44-line) Perl script that will do the job. It's not
flexible on the argument format - they have to be -mm-dd - and
it is Perl, but at least it doesn't use a zillion modules. The only
module it does use is POSIX, and that's only to get the floor() function;
if you aren't going
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:49]:
> > > Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list]
> > The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would be very hard to
> > scratch this one if it itches you.
>
> so much for t
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> $ TIMEFMT="%D" ./timediff "4/6/67" "3/28/02"
> Difference is 11773.96 days.
Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong.
1967-04-06 to 2002-03-28 is 12,775 days. Maybe
your %D is not the same as his %D? Where did 'timediff'
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:46]:
> * "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > anyone have a utility to calculate the
> > number of days between two given dates?
> > i mean - easily? no perl script
> > with dozens of modules, please!
>
> shell$ env TIMEFMT="%D" ./timed
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:49]:
> > Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list]
> The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would
> be very hard to scratch this one if it itches you.
so much for theory.
well, i find it bad by design that "message-hook"
does
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:33:36AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
>
> Think of it as like a Linux distribution. Linux is the OS, RedHat or
> Debian is the distribution. Saying "Solaris" is like saying "Debian",
> only slower and less free. :-)
Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks curre
* On 2002.03.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> apropos:
> anyone have a utility to calculate the
> number of days between two given dates?
> i mean - easily? no perl script
> with dozens of modules, please!
shell$ ./timediff "Wed Mar 27 17:33:00 20
Rocky Giannini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set folder=~/Mail'
This is problematic. The problem is that, when you enter a pathname
like "=folder" into a send-hook or a $record variable, you might expect
that Mutt simply stores the "=folder" string in the hook
On 17:15 27 Mar 2002, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 2) My wife likes Windows. Only just got her into computing, it's a bit
| early for KDE in English since she is mainly French speaking. I refuse to
| have an OS in any other language than English.
But if you have the KDE internationali
At 00:18 +0100 28 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:14]:
> > At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Charles Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 20:07]:
> > > > or even
> > > > "tag/delete ever
* Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:14]:
> At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Charles Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 20:07]:
> > > or even
> > > "tag/delete everything older than ",
> > > whatever is easier.
> > this is not included - sor
* A. Reinhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 06:44]:
> When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag
> them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message line
> further if the end of the display is reached. Now what i would
> like to have is that the index scrolls...uhhhm
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then
> > you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right?
> unhook mess
At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Charles Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 20:07]:
> > or even
> > "tag/delete everything older than ",
> > whatever is easier.
>
> this is not included - sorry.
Wrong. T~d>5d will tag all messages older than 5 days. w(
On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then
> you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right?
unhook message-hook
This removes all message-hooks currently defined, but it
* Charles Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 20:07]:
> Is there a way to tag or delete by date.
yes - you can tag messages by pattern "~d"
which acceses their date.
> I use to do this a while back using mush. Since I have a
> lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports
> for exam
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 18:55]:
> * On 2002.03.27, in <20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab>,
> * "cruciatuz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets
> > the wrong date in my outgoing email.
> > current timestamp (date command):
> > Mit Mär 27
You can use folder hooks to delete, say, anything older than a month
that isn't marked important:
folder-hook IN\.mutt 'push D~r>1m!~F'
This will be done automatically when you load the specified folder.
Steve
Charles Gagnon wrote:
> Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do th
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:55:19PM -0500:
>
> No, no -- I meant that you had better check your copy of his key; as
> shown, it works fine for me.
I don't have a copy of his key; GPG attempted to import it from the
keyserver, but the one on the keyserver didn't
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:40:46PM -0500:
% >
% > % Sign your key and re-submit it.
% >
% > Better check what you have, too.
%
% If my key wasn't signed, GPG wouldn't accept it.
No, no -- I meant that you had b
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:40:46PM -0500:
>
> % Sign your key and re-submit it.
>
> Better check what you have, too.
If my key wasn't signed, GPG wouldn't accept it.
msg26307/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:29:20PM -0500:
%
% gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ...
% gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid subkey binding
% gpg: key 57C3430B: no valid user IDs
% gpg: this may be
begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:29:20PM -0500:
gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ...
gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid subkey binding
gpg: key 57C3430B: no valid user IDs
gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
Sign your key and re-submit
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% You could write a macro to automatically delete messages older than a
% certain date from a certain person, all in one keypress...
Of course, if you did so, it would be wise to use Nicolas's tag-conditional
patch to ensure that it works as des
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 27-Mar-02 at 13:07, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus:
% > > Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf
% > > seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be
Charles --
...and then Charles Gagnon said...
%
% Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using
Yes.
% mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports
% for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and
Mak
27-Mar-02 at 15:07, Charles Gagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using
> mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports
> for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and
Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using
mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports
for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and
previous month for example. All I would need is a way to say "tag/de
27-Mar-02 at 13:07, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus:
> > Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf
> > seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be
> > more specific -> meaning that he thinks it is _very_ sp
--6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus:
> Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf
> seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps coul
27-Mar-02 at 14:37, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> It also supports compression, but you can't change that once a session is
> running. Fire up putty, load your target profile, and then go down to SSH
> on the menu listing on the left side (assuming you are running something
> current li
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 27-Mar-02 at 12:39, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > > 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > > > You probably didn't have compression set. Try run
27-Mar-02 at 12:39, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C
> > > option. It makes a dramatic diff
* On 2002.03.27, in <20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab>,
* "cruciatuz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing
> email. i checked the "date" command and my bios-configuration, and both
> are ok. where else do i have to check in o
Firstly,
Thank you to everyone who pointed me at the options I needed to play with
to get reverse_name working properly.
For the record, the following options are the ones that affect the way that
the reverse_name option functions. (minus 'my_hdr From')
set realname = "Tim Kennedy"
set from =
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 11.28 -0700]:
> Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > > > As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more
> > > > specific? ;-)
> >
> > > What are you getting at? ;)
> >
> > Sorry, I don't get this one. Either it's too late or I'm t
27-Mar-02 at 19:29, cruciatuz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing
> email. i checked the "date" command and my bios-configuration, and both
> are ok. where else do i have to check in order to solve this problem?
>
The email head
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C
> > option. It makes a dramatic difference.
>
> So, I have PuTTY for SSH, will look into the options and c
i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing
email. i checked the "date" command and my bios-configuration, and both
are ok. where else do i have to check in order to solve this problem?
i use:
System: Linux 2.4.3-20mdk
Mutt: 1.3.27i
mutt -v gives me:
-DOMAIN
-DEBUG
Yep. I've gotten this same feedback from a few others. Modified
patch (w/ mapping to ^\) is attached.
Thanks,
Steve
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Mar 26, Steve Talley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > filter-message (default: &)
>
> FWIW, the edit-threads patch, which quite a lot of people use
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > > As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more
> > > specific? ;-)
>=20
> > What are you getting at? ;)
>=20
Robert --
...and then Robert Conde said...
%
% You can get half a page, too. Am I wrong?
%
% [ Up 1/2 page
%
% ] Down 1/2 page
No, you're not wrong, but that isn't exactly what the user wanted. He
wanted to move the cursor down along the messages and have the index
display follow along.
27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C
> option. It makes a dramatic difference.
I am running WinME at home. I know, it's a travesty... here are my
excuses:
1) My modem is a winmodem (Kortex PCI 56k
> Here's a patch. I'm currently using it and haven't seen any problems, but i
> haven't exactly stress-tested it yet, either.
The patch makes mutt act spastic if you set index_context to a huge number
(greater than, approximately, your window size divided by two).
So don't do that.
msg26284/p
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you
> > > have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the
You can get half a page, too. Am I wrong?
[ Up 1/2 page
] Down 1/2 page
-R
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:54:50PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> A. Reinhold wrote:
> > When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do
>anything else, the index
> > scrolls one me
> What'd I'd like to see is a behavior where the list starts scrolling as
> you get within some arbitrary number (2-3 probably) of lines from the
> bottom.
You know what? I've wanted this functionality for a long time and i didn't
even consciously realize it.
Here's a patch. I'm currently using
27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you
> > have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the screen, even if you're good
> > with vim (or whatever you
27-Mar-02 at 08:09, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> % > Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> % > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
> % >
> % > why ever not?
> %
> % Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever
> % want to use it.
>
> ps is "process status" or somethi
Dave --
I couldn't find your PGP key. Is it on a bunch of servers?
...and then Dave Price said...
%
% I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ...
That's a good start. You'll need to go back, though :-)
If you just didn't look at this stuff the first time around, then that
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 10:31]:
> I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ...
>
> Are there quick ways to:
>
> * change to main inbox?
If you mean your spool ($MAIL in the shell), there is the !
shortcut.
> * save a message to a specific folder without c
> * change to main inbox?
! is a shortcut for that one, so c! is probably what you want.
> * select and save a group of messages matching a pattern to a particular
> folder?
Check out the help screen you get when pressing '?':
T tag-pattern tag messages matching a pattern
;
I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ...
Are there quick ways to:
* change to main inbox?
* save a message to a specific folder without confirmation - can i turn
the append to folder confirmation off globally?
* select and save a group of messages matching a pattern to a
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500:
% >
% > % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although
% > % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt
% > % knows it
Quoting Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 17:25]:
> * David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 19:34]:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:30:19AM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > > ..it would be way cool to have an inte
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500:
>
> % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although
> % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt
> % knows it's signed). those changes are from Thomas Roessler.
>
>
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:28:25AM -0500:
>
> Yeah; that was a very funny time. Too bad NT5 was renamed to Win2000 and
> announced just ONE DAY before the fantastic announcement of Solaris 7,
> the Operating System Rushed Out The Door In Time To Have A Higher
>
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 26-Mar-02 at 11:33, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > if you have shell access on your mail machine, and it's on a good
> > connection, i'd just run mutt on the machine itself.
...
> Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH
begin quoting what Matthew D. Fuller said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32AM -0600:
>
> I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname, on any sane
> system, displays the hostname when called with no args, and tries to set
> it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solar
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:03:43:AM +0100 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke:
> > Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I
> > create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also
> > create folder-hooks to set Reply-To
Quoting David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 27, 2002 08:19]:
> > I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname,
> > on any sane system, displays the hostname when called with no
> > args, and tries to set
>
> I agree so far, but ...
Here is I think what happened:
$ uname -a; hostna
Matthew --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
%
% On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05AM -0500 I heard the voice of
% David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
% >
% > % it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solaris assumes that
% > % you're always trying to set it, even to nothing.
% >
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05AM -0500 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> % it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solaris assumes that
> % you're always trying to set it, even to nothing.
>
> Really? I've never heard of that.
>
> nfs5{43} uname -a
>
Matthew, et al --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
%
% On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of
% Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus:
% > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% >
% > > Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of
> Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my pr
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote:
% > Text based rules,
%
% Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio
% and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)
*
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Will Yardley spake thus:
% > Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
% >
% > why ever not?
%
% Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever
% want to use it.
ps is "process status" or something li
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alright, I wasn't exactly thinking when I said "all gpl", but you know
% what I mean. Everything on my system is compiled from source, it's all
% one free license or another.
We figured out what you meant when you made such a broad and fairly
unsupportable
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100:
>
> Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine'
> it says that only root may run 'uname'. My response: 'exit'.
Did you by any chance have a -S in that uname call?
Because that's the only un
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% for those not on the mutt dev list, pgp_create_traditional works again
% in 1.5.0 (cvs version - a patch from Armin Wolfermann), and the behavior
Yay. That's always nice.
% has been changed so t
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of
Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine'
> > it says that only root may run 'uname'. My respons
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:35:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Tim --
>
> ...and then Tim said...
> %
> % Somewhere between version 1.2.5i and 1.3.27i the behavior of SigInt
>
> How?
Sorry I wasn't clear. With 1.2.5i, hitting ^C quits mutt completely
without prompt. With 1.3.27i, it asks if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rocco!
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote:
> > I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back
> > to the list of active groups when using Mutt/
Tim --
...and then Tim said...
%
% Somewhere between version 1.2.5i and 1.3.27i the behavior of SigInt
How?
% changed. I am used to hitting ^C to get out of mutt (the main reason
% is that I have a script that looks through a number of folders and ^C
% has a different exit code than "q". "q
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote:
% > % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few
% > % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time
%
% > Heh
Rocky --
...and then Rocky Giannini said...
%
% David,
%
% First -- Thanks very much for the quick response. When I saw your reply,
Happy to help!
% I thought for sure that would work -- Unfortunately, I made the change,
% and I'm still seeing the same behavior.
Ah.
%
% Here's what the
On Mar 27 at 04:41, Markus Hubig spoke:
> > > > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l,
> > > > something like:
> > > >
> > > > send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l'
> > > >
> > > > The ~l won't be substituted in my_hdr. Is there some means to achieve
> > > > this?
>
>
On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke:
>
> Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I
> create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also
> create folder-hooks to set Reply-To: to the list address. Works.
Good idea. I probably should do the same.
On Wed 27-Mar-2002 at 12:50:04 -0800, Mike Erickson wrote:
>
> topofscreen===
> 1
> 2
> 3
> >
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8
> ===bottomscreen===
>
> as you scroll down (marker = '>'), when you hit 6, scrolling down
> leaves '>' in the same place but moves the whole list 1..8 up a spot
> to reveal 2..9. Th
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote:
> > Text based rules,
>
> Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio
> and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)
* A. Reinhold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One question: When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the
> index to tag them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message
> line further if the end of the display is reached. Now what i would
> like to have is that the index scrol
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > > A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I
> > > enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the
> > > message is.
> >
> > As your X-U
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote:
> % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few
> % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time
> Heh. And you talk about not wanting to spam! :-)
You're lucky. I'm too ti
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote:
> I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back
> to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP
Probably does depend on the patch. Which one do you use? I use the
vvv.nntp patch. Just move around as
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:02:31:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote:
> I think if you \ the backticks, they will be evaluated when the
> variable is read, and not when the config is read. So, instead
> of:
> set record="`date +'%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M'`"
> use something like:
> set record="\`da
David,
First -- Thanks very much for the quick response. When I saw your reply,
I thought for sure that would work -- Unfortunately, I made the change,
and I'm still seeing the same behavior.
Here's what the default account-hook entry looks like now:
account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set folde
26-Mar-02 at 11:33, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> jennyw wrote:
>
> > Also, I notice that when I open up a folder, it gets all the headers
> > before it displays them. Is there a way to get it to a) cache
> > information) or b) read only some of the headers instead of all of
> > them
100 matches
Mail list logo
