On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you
> > > have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the screen, even if you're good
> > > with vim (or whatever you set $THE_ONE_TRUE_EDITOR to) is not responsive
> > > enough. And if you have a connection that is fast enough not to notice
> > > that, you can probably download mail fast anyway. I SSH to my workstation
> > > from a fixed IP authenticated dialup connection at home and it's too slow
> > > to compose mail, although reading mail is quicker with Mutt than PINE
> > > running locally and just fetching mail from the server. This is largely
> > > due to the pager allowing faster browsing of mail.
> > 
> > Weird.  I used to do this all the time before I had DSL, and it was never a
> > problem.  And the mail server I was connecting to was a 486 w/12M of RAM.
> > The initial connection was slow, but after that it was fine.
> > 
> > Are you using SSH compression?  It helps a lot.
> 
> How fast do you type? I'm at ~55wpm if typing easy mail where I don't
> think too much.

Faster than that.

> Not sure if I had compression set. In any case, I don't like ANY delay
> between keypress and letter appearing on screen, since I'm not looking at
> the keys as I type, and if the display is constantly "catching up" it
> throws me right off.

You probably didn't have compression set.  Try running ssh with the -C
option.  It makes a dramatic difference.

Attachment: msg26283/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to