I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any
reason to recompile mutt?
Thanks.
-Ken
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:17:04AM -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote:
: On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: > Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems.
:
: I'm glad to hear it!
I've had mutt-1.2.5 compiled with ncurses-5.2 for quite some time now
(it's been fine since OS X PB). I ne
David Rock wrote:
> You should be able to remove his key from your keyring. I would
> think that would fix it.
yes that's what i would think too. but it doesn't appear to be there as
far as i can tell (again i'm not a huge pgp expert):
this is how i would view my keyring, right?
zugzug% pgp -k
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:46:29PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> does anyone else have problems with messages from this guy? i don't
> know a whole lot about pgp, but i might have accidentally hit the
> command to add him - i get 'pgp signature successfully vertified' when
> receiving a message f
does anyone else have problems with messages from this guy? i don't
know a whole lot about pgp, but i might have accidentally hit the
command to add him - i get 'pgp signature successfully vertified' when
receiving a message from him, but then get an error like this:
From: Jean-Sebastien Moriss
msg.pgp
Hi,
I just upgraded to mutt 1.2.5, and its insisting on coloring
everything. I managed to get close to what I want by commenting
HAVE_COLOR out of config.h, but now I still get things like
underlining quoted text, boldface in headers, etc. I want plain
text. Suggestions for how to get there?
* Michael Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010817 13:16]:
> Here's an infinitesimal elaboration which takes addresses from
> one file and the message text from a second. Someone else can
> show how to use a multi-word subject.
>
I'm on it:
./batchmailer ./addr_list ./message "Here's a multi-line su
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:28:07PM -0400, John Bacalle muttered:
--> * Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010802 16:01]:
--> > Not so busy lately. You are correct. Wanna talk about something
--> > else? :)
-->
--> I haven't received any list traffic since 8 August, have I been dropped
--> ag
Here's an infinitesimal elaboration which takes addresses from
one file and the message text from a second. Someone else can
show how to use a multi-word subject.
#!/bin/sh
#
if [ $# -ne 3 ] ;
then
echo "Usage: `basename $0` AddressFile MessageFile Subject(one word)" ;
exit 1;
fi
#
if [ !
All,
I would like to roll any message in my inbox that is older than 2
weeks old to an archive folder. I tried this pattern, but I got the
message "Tagging is not supported" when .muttrc loads.
folder-hook INBOX 'push
"~d>2w=archive"'
Am I going about this incorrectly? Is this so
On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems.
I'm glad to hear it!
> If you're talking
> about a GUI version, Muttzilla might compile with XFree86 installed.
> If you're talking about a Cocoa or Carbon version, I dunno.
No, nothing special, just re
,[ To [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) dijo sobre "set subject
on send-hook?":
|
| [...]
|
| So here's my first question: is it possible to set the subject on a
| send-hook? I have some addresses for which I would like to prepend
| something like [info] or [urgent!] to the subject line
Thus spake Keith Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here is my .muttrc:
> ignore *
> unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
Don't know if it makes a difference, but maybe you need to leave the
colons off. Here's mine:
# message headers
ignore *
unignore from to cc date su
On Tue 07-Aug-2001 at 01:42:47PM +0200, Ulf Erikson wrote:
> I wrote two macros about a year ago to let me ,Thread or ,Unthread
> mails at my will. You'll find the macros in the archives or attached.
> It would be nice to have this functionallity in Mutt though.
I agree, I've just rethreaded a m
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:20:57PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> That's mostly a matter of taste - I find enscript's fancy header
> nicer than the one produced by a2ps...
>
> (However, I have changed to a2ps for most things - it just has
> pretty-printing for more programming languages inc
Keith Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The only headers I can see are From: and Subject:
>
> Here is my .muttrc:
> ignore *
> unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
[...]
> When I toggle "h" there are blank
> lines where the headers should be.
> How do I make them
> apear?
Perhaps a wrong color
On 17.08.2001 00:05:02 Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> Is it possible to do batch emailing in mutt? Here's the scenario. I want
> to send the same messsage to a bunch of different people, but they have
> to go as individual messages (one to each user). I can't put all the
> users in the to: due to
The only headers I can see are From: and Subject:
Here is my .muttrc:
ignore *
unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
Here is my /usr/etc/Muttrc:
# default list of header fields to weed when
# displaying
#
#ignore "from " received content- mime-version status x-status message-id
#ign
Aaron Schrab [17/08/01 03:05 -0500]:
> As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't
Bad enough :)
> Older versions of Mac OS only support HFS, so they won't work with UFS
> at all. And from what I hear some programs even have trouble running in
> OS X on UFS. As for the
Chris Wong [17/08/01 00:08 -0700]:
> This might be slightly off topic, but is there any way to make mutt
> send mail to an SMTP host directly like pine? If not, how do I make
> sendmail use a particular smtp host?
This has been answered quite often. Mutt will always use an external smtp
ag
At 12:42 +0530 17 Aug 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch.
As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't
think there's a sendmail config option to make it ignore world-writeable
directories. And as
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 09:01 -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> * Dave Ewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 16:13 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> >
> > > Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
> >
> > Ought to have mentioned - you'll need LaTex installed, plus dvi
On 2001-08-16 13:35:54 -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote:
>Anyone know of any attempted ports of Mutt to Max OS-X?
Just try - I'd expect it to work.
--
Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/
On 2001-08-16 13:14:26 -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
>> set print_cmd="enscript -Email -2 -r -G" # Two columns, landscape, fancy header.
>> set print_split=yes# Invoke enscript once per message
>Should that be pipe_split ?
No, print_split is correct.
>Is enscript
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:42:55PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
: Aaron Schrab [17/08/01 01:58 -0500]:
:
: > O DontBlameSendmail=GroupWritableDirPathSafe
:
: So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch.
Not world-writable, just group-writable. Still bad.
: A chmod or two
26 matches
Mail list logo
