On 2001-08-16 13:14:26 -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
>> set print_cmd="enscript -Email -2 -r -G" # Two columns, landscape, fancy header.
>> set print_split=yes # Invoke enscript once per message
>Should that be pipe_split ?
No, print_split is correct.
>Is enscript preferable to a2ps?
That's mostly a matter of taste - I find enscript's fancy header
nicer than the one produced by a2ps...
(However, I have changed to a2ps for most things - it just has
pretty-printing for more programming languages included, and that's
better than nothing.)
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
