On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:07:52AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> John Kerbawy proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > I can't figure out how to tell mutt to check for new mail automatically.
> > I'd like to be able to glance over at my mutt window and see if new mail
> > has come in withou
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 03:11:43PM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote:
>A day or two ago, someone on this list mentioned setting up a procmail
>recipe to have gpg get keys automatically.
That would be I.
>Does anyone have an example
>of such a recipe?
Not yet. But I'll elaborate a little further with
John Kerbawy proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I can't figure out how to tell mutt to check for new mail automatically.
> I'd like to be able to glance over at my mutt window and see if new mail
> has come in without hitting 'Tab.'
> Does mutt provide this feature?
If you have mail arriving in
Hi.
I can't figure out how to tell mutt to check for new mail automatically.
I'd like to be able to glance over at my mutt window and see if new mail
has come in without hitting 'Tab.'
Does mutt provide this feature?
__
John Kerbawy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I need to set my own headers in my e-mail messages, I know how
to do the usual From: Reply-To etc. But my problem now is that I need to
override the default headers like Content-Type: text/plain to whatever I
want. I can do it the usual way using my_hdr, but mutt adds its own
header sa
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 04:02:37AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: I'm trying to set up a folder-hook that matches all mailboxes I read
: beginning with a specific character. However, the ^ metacharacter does
: not appear to work at all for some reason. Here's an example that
: should work but doe
Hi Rod Pike !
On Sun 17 Dec 2000 (23:32), you muttered on the list:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
> > Hi Rod Pike !
> >
> > On Sun 17 Dec 2000 (17:23), you muttered on the list:
> >
> > > Are there ways of configuring mutt and GnuPG to easily encrypt messages
>
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
> Hi Rod Pike !
>
> On Sun 17 Dec 2000 (17:23), you muttered on the list:
>
> > Are there ways of configuring mutt and GnuPG to easily encrypt messages
> > that can be easily decrypted by colleagues using Outlook/PGP?
> >
>
> Yes. Us
A day or two ago, someone on this list mentioned setting up a procmail
recipe to have gpg get keys automatically. Does anyone have an example
of such a recipe?
--
.~.
/v\ Lance Simmons
// \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/( )\
__^_^__
Petr Hlustik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 10 Dec 2000:
> Is it possible to change the help bar at the top of mutt screen?
As far as I know, it's not. You can either make the help line visible
or invisible, but that's where the customization features end.
I asssume it would be quite trivial
Larry Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 09 Dec 2000:
> mutt -f =mutt -e 'set delete;push D~r>2wq'
>
> This is the error message:
>
> No recipients specified.
> run-parts: /etc/cron.test/muttxpr exited with return code 1
I think the issue here is that Mutt won't run in the b
On 12/18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> as it is zero bytes, what is the problem? a waste of bandwidth? ;)
Severe annoyance. And it takes me longer to delete the existing lines in
the message body (signature) than it does to hit "D" to delete that
unnecessary attachement.
I guess what you're
At 01:30 PM 12/17/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Then I have a 0 byte attachment that I *still* can't delete, which is just
>more annoying.
as it is zero bytes, what is the problem? a waste of bandwidth? ;)
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org +
On 12/17, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Leave the message body blank, willya? That should solve the
> problem.
Then I have a 0 byte attachment that I *still* can't delete, which is just
more annoying.
> Also, put something like "set abort_unmodified=ask-no" in your
> .muttrc
Didn't help.
At 01:13 PM 12/17/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In cases where a message body is truly not necessary, like emailing a list
>server where the commands go in the subject, it really frustrates me that
>I can't delete the extra stuff, which would be simple if it weren't for
>this restriction.
How can I make mutt allow me to "...delete the only attachment" ?
In cases where a message body is truly not necessary, like emailing a list
server where the commands go in the subject, it really frustrates me that
I can't delete the extra stuff, which would be simple if it weren't for
this restr
Hi Rod Pike !
On Sun 17 Dec 2000 (17:23), you muttered on the list:
> Are there ways of configuring mutt and GnuPG to easily encrypt messages
> that can be easily decrypted by colleagues using Outlook/PGP?
>
Yes. Use cleartext signing and http://www.pgpi.com 's Outlook PGP plugin.
--
GUI
Wha
Are there ways of configuring mutt and GnuPG to easily encrypt messages
that can be easily decrypted by colleagues using Outlook/PGP?
--
Rod Pike
rodneyp @ utanet.at
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:08:07AM -0200, Rod Pike wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 06, 2000 (CS:3.49.341) 22:54:19 [PM] (-0200)
> > Rod Pike [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
> >
> > > What version of pgp are you using? I don't get a list o
I'm trying to set up a folder-hook that matches all mailboxes I read
beginning with a specific character. However, the ^ metacharacter does
not appear to work at all for some reason. Here's an example that
should work but does not:
folder-hook ^b 'save-hook . =bobby'
Putting single quo
20 matches
Mail list logo
