Re: send pubkey trouble

On Tue 07/11/00 at 12:41 PM -0400, Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mis-wrote - I really used k, and *that* created an empty > attachment. Am I trying to do this the right way? I want to > extract my public key and send it using mutt - any help is > appreciated ;-) I, too, am unabl

Re: A better mutt? (Was Re: catchup command?)

Była godzina 12:46:39 w poniedziałek 25 wrzesień, gdy do autobusu wsiadł kanar i wrzasnął:"Suresh Ramasubramanian!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to: >> (what a grammar construction ;). Walking further, the pop3 support >> should give ability to plug in procmail somewhere to sort messa

Key synonyms

Is there a way to have key synonyms? For instance, we could say that \e[A is a synonym for . Then, anywhere appears in a binding, \e[A would also be accepted. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championna

Re: scripts, how?

Hi! Lukasz Stelmach muttered: > I have read some letters about perl/python scripts that can be somehow > connected to mutt. I use mutt 1.0.1i (i know it is old) and there is > nothing said in dox. All you need are the and functions to call any unix command from within mutt. This certainly goes

scripts, how?

Greetings All!!! I have read some letters about perl/python scripts that can be somehow connected to mutt. I use mutt 1.0.1i (i know it is old) and there is nothing said in dox. Which is the first version that supports this feature and is it clearly described in manual? HANDON -- |/ |_,

Really wierd file locking problem

I've asked the list for help with this once before - here's hoping I can do a better job of explaining it this time... Ever since I upgraded from 0.95.1 to 1.2.*, I've been seeing problems with .lock files being left around in my ~/Mail directory when I s)ave or C)opy messages into a mbox folder

Re: RFC2369 support

On 2000-09-22 18:04:51 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > You could start by fixing the 'mutt-rfc2368' script in the ftp > contrib directory. Amongst (several) other improvements, it needs > to be able to cope with the ?body=info part of a > type uri, (it already >

Re: multiple recipients

On 2000.09.25 10:48:18, you, the extraordinary Petr Kristan, opined: > I have recipient addresses in the file. > Can I specify in To: field, that recipients are from this file. > If your mutt uses sendmail, you could use the sendmail aliases file so: poets: ":include:/usr/local/lib/poets.li

Re: Content-Disposition

On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:29:10PM +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote: > Is there a way I can teach mutt to use "inline", too? > I am currently using Mutt 1.0.1i ^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i. (If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding described. :) -- - Br

Content-Disposition

Hi! When I send a mail with a JPG-attachment to a friend that uses the netscape mailer, the picture does not get displayed inline, but when I use netscape to send this mail, it does get displayed inline. So, I compared the two mails and found that mutt writes: Content-Disposition: attachment in

Q: Why no special characters?

Hello Mutt people, Something that's been bugging me over the last few days/weeks since I upgraded from Mutt 1.2.x to Mutt 1.3.x - "special" characters aren't displayed properly. e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for most of you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3).

Re: multiple recipients

Petr Kristan proclaimed on mutt-users that: > I have recipient addresses in the file. > Can I specify in To: field, that recipients are from this file. > I know, I can make a script :-). set edit_headers in your muttrc. In the to field, esc :r recipients.txt (assuming vi / clones thereof) that

multiple recipients

I have recipient addresses in the file. Can I specify in To: field, that recipients are from this file. I know, I can make a script :-). -- Ing. Petr Kristan . EPOS PRO s.r.o., Bozeny Nemcove 2625, 530 02 Pardubice tel: +420 40 6335223, 38764 fax: +420 40 6335224 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A better mutt? (Was Re: catchup command?)

On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 06:06:05PM +0200, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > > BTW. Anyone knows any other than 'serialmail' way to use qmail over > dialup (dynamic IP) > Yes, there's a patch written by a qmail user that I used to use which makes qmail via a dial-up connection *much* easier. It's called

Re: A better mutt? (Was Re: catchup command?)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 08:45:56PM +0200, Wouter Verheijen wrote: > Well, a GUI does have some advantages: > - One can read HTML-mail... OK, people should not be sending html, but > really a lot of (Microsoft)-users, do. It would be quite nice to view > the layout they intended with fonts inline i

Re: A better mutt? (Was Re: catchup command?)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 05:39:59PM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote: > Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000: > > > Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa". > > > (Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things to do > > > any decade now...) > >

Re: A better mutt? (Was Re: catchup command?)

Lukasz Stelmach proclaimed on mutt-users that: > But there is one major problem that none of well known text-based (of > coures that is not the matter of UI) mailreaders does not solve. > Spooling. When i use either mutt, pine or simple mail first i have to Masqmail / Nullmailer are your friend