I just did a very minimal installation of redhat 6.1 and I have lost my
colors...
something to the extent of color command not found when parsing my
configs
Mutt 1.1.11i (2000-03-30)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `m
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3 - Is there any way to get mutt in *non-IMAP* mode to 'see' maildir
> directories starting with a '.'?
Mutt normally doesn't show files that start with "." because of this
default setting:
set mask="!^\.[^.]"
If you unset it, I suppose you wou
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > set reply_regexp="^(((re(\\[[0-9]+\\])?|fwd):|\\[[a-z0-9-]+\\])[ \t]+)+"
>
> Thanks, but this does not fully work for me.
That is odd.
> Further more replying to your message yielded a subject line
> (corrected by hand) of "Re: Re: Recognizing such thr
Now that I seem to have the basics of mutt working with the Courier
IMAP server I have some more questions/comments about how mutt works
with IMAP.
1 - I have the following in my muttrc file:-
set folder={x-1.net:50143}
set spoolfile={x-1.net:50143}inbox
A 'c' followed by a !' takes
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 05:23:31PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 April 2000 at 22:05, Chris Green wrote:
> > I recently installed Courier IMAP and while getting things sorted out
> > had the following message from Sam Varshavchik.
> > > Yes, that works, thanks! Mutt actually promp
On Thursday, 27 April 2000 at 22:05, Chris Green wrote:
> I recently installed Courier IMAP and while getting things sorted out
> had the following message from Sam Varshavchik.
> > Yes, that works, thanks! Mutt actually prompts me with "{x-1.net}/"
> > so I have to delete the "/" but still, it d
I recently installed Courier IMAP and while getting things sorted out
had the following message from Sam Varshavchik.
- Forwarded message from Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Chris Green wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:21:48PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 11:06:55AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> From: Jose Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm not familiear with Gnus, but I am with RFC822, and this
> style of address is garbage.
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
> This^^ is an RFC822 header **comment**, and
Telsa --
...and then Telsa Gwynne said...
% On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 09:23:12AM -0400 or thereabouts, Bakki Kudva wrote:
% > Telsa Gwynne wrote:
% > > anything. (I once found about four ways to list the contents of a directory
% > > at the command line without even trying too hard!) It's a pain in
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 09:23:12AM -0400 or thereabouts, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> > Welcome to unix-land, where there always at least five ways to do
> > anything. (I once found about four ways to list the contents of a directory
> > at the command line without even trying too ha
From: Jose Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> is it possible to use Gnus style 'From: ' addresses when sending
> mail:
I'm not familiear with Gnus, but I am with RFC822, and this
style of address is garbage.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
This^^ is an RFC822 header **comment**, a
Jose Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 27 Apr 2000:
> is it possible to use Gnus style 'From: ' addresses when sending
> mail:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
No, it's not, as far as I know, not even with my_hdr. Mutt will convert
that style headers into the Name format.
Regards,
M
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 27 Apr 2000:
> Perhaps I am using a too old mutt for your regexp (Mutt 1.0i (1999-10-22))?
That's unlikely, I think Mutt uses usually an external regexp library
anyway which means that any such trouble would not be related to the
Mutt version rather th
Mutt isn't the tool for this, try metamail, it has
a mail work-alike with intelligent and systematic
MIME extensions (and MIME is what specifies how
to encode non-us-ascii chars in header).
Sam
--
Sam Roberts, sam at cogent dot ca, www.cogent.ca
> (3) The receipient gets unreadable Subject lik
Telsa Gwynne wrote:
>
> Welcome to unix-land, where there always at least five ways to do
> anything. (I once found about four ways to list the contents of a directory
> at the command line without even trying too hard!) It's a pain in the
> neck at first, and then you can't live without it.
>
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> There's a setting that tells mutt how and for how long to wait for sendmail
> (copied directly from the manual):
>
> ==
> sendmail_wait
> Type: number
> Default: 0
>
> Specifies the number of second
"John P . Looney" wrote:
> Well, to get around this, add this to your muttrc:
>
> set sendmail_wait=5 # Wait 5 seconds for sendmail to return, then put to background
Thank you for that hint. I'll try it. I may have bigger issues with the
way
sendmail is configured!
> Sendmail could be slow
This was right on the money! Good call.
Thanks,
joe
Stefan `Sec` Zehl([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at
12:48:47AM +0200:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 10:47:21AM -0400, Joe Rice wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Could someone tell me why mutt strips an URL from the body of
> > my out-going email? It on
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 04:48:09PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > one list I am subscribed to adds a prefix of "[TheList] " even for replied
> > messages leading to threads of the sort:
> > [TheList] Subject
> > [TheList] Re: Subject
> > How can mutt be to
Adam Lazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 27 Apr 2000:
> The odd thing is, if I test email to plogic.com twice in a row, from
> _will_ change after the first time. Is there an issue with setting the
> from variable with a send-hook ?
Indeed, there is. You can set it but it won't affect the cu
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 05:43:47AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> send-hook '~t plogic.com' 'set signature=~/.signature.work from="Adam Lazur
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
send-hook '~t plogic.com' 'set signature="~/.signature.work" ;\
my_hdr From: "Adam Lazur" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 05:43:47AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> send-hook '~t plogic.com' 'set signature=~/.signature.work from="Adam Lazur
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
send-hook '~t plogic.com' 'set signature="~/.signature.work" ;\
my_hdr From: "Adam Lazur" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I have the following in my .muttrc:
send-hook '~t plogic.com' 'set signature=~/.signature.work from="Adam Lazur
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
Which I think is telling mutt that want it to use my plogic.com
address and work signature when emailing people at plogic.com.
However, it doesn't work that way
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 27 Apr 2000:
> So far, I have found mention of
>
> procmail
> maildrop
> mailfilter
> sieve
> exim
... also qmail, you can have the .qmail-extension files in your home
dir with different delivery instructions for your
username-extension@host
On Thursday, 27.04.2000 at 01:20 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ... an external program like procmail is, by far, the better way to go.
> For one thing, mutt filtering won't happen until you get into mutt and
> (probably) start pressing keys to tag and save by yourself (though you
> might get clever a
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:16:27AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Now, is mbox-hook what I want? The typical user is going to have all of
> his email dumped right into $MAIL and then want mutt to move Linux stuff
> here and mutt stuff there and cron jobs elsewhere, and I don't know that
> mbox-hook g
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:16:27AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Hi, folks --
>
> I'm [finally!] drafting up a mutt FAQ entry on filtering incoming email
> to answer all of those "how do I get mutt to move my mail for me?"
> questions. So far, I have found mention of
>
> procmail
> maildrop
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
