On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 10:45:15AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> I'd just like to have better control over when gpg tries to
> download keys, I wish it (or mutt) would ask "hey, do you want
> me to try and fetch this key from $keyserver?".
Have you tried hitting ^C if the fetch is taking too long?
Bingo! Thanks!
Sam
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:48:58AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Sam --
>
> ...and then Sam Roberts said...
> % mutt says my /usr/spool/mail/sam spool file is read-only, any
> % idea why? It's only used for local-to-my-machine mail, but
> % I'd like to have it be read/write.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 06:30:25PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-04-05-04:14:56 Sebastian Helms:
> > > I'd like mutt to not verify signatures that are not in my
> > > keyring, in particular I don't want gpg to trying to connect
> > > to the keyserver when I'm not on-line. How is gpg being call
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 21:34:54 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Once I thought about asking for a new command -- . Then
> I realized that it was not necessary -- one could just write a macro
> like this: !()
Please find my attempt to make such a macro in the attached file:
Save it, source it, a
2000-04-05-04:14:56 Sebastian Helms:
> > I'd like mutt to not verify signatures that are not in my
> > keyring, in particular I don't want gpg to trying to connect
> > to the keyserver when I'm not on-line. How is gpg being called
> > for key verification, and is there a way to make it not contact
From: Sebastian Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
>
> * Sam Roberts wrote on 04 Apr 2000:
>
> > I don't know if this is a gpg question, or a mutt one, but...
>
> a gpg one ;-)
>
> > I'd like mutt to not verify signatures that are not in my
> > keyring, in particular I don't want gpg to tryi
(Hello, everyone, again. Somehow I got unsubscribed from this list --
maybe my subscription had expired? ;-) Or maybe just my ISP's mail
server went down at the wrong moment.)
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 04:52:44PM -0400, Michael Tatge wrote:
> I just played around with the $sort_aux variable and I
At 18:25 +0300 05 Apr 2000, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the compose menu, there's a function called "get-attachment"
> (bound to G) but it didn't seem to do anything for me, and I can't
> tell what it is supposed to do based on the description.
It copies the selected attachment
Once I thought about asking for a new command -- . Then
I realized that it was not necessary -- one could just write a macro
like this: !()
So far so good. However there's a strange bug/feature:
foo limits to messages matching pattern foo
!(foo)limits to messages not matc
Matt Dunford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 05 Apr 2000:
> Is there a way to specify a program for a signiture file?
Yes.
> I was thinking along the lines of something like:
> set signature="! perl rand_saying.pl"
Close.
set signature="perl rand_saying.pl|"
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko H
Matt --
...and then Matt Dunford said...
% Dear Mutt Users:
%
% Is there a way to specify a program for a signiture file? I've tried
Yep.
% various ways without success and I've also browsed the site, the faq, and
% the news archives.
Well, from the manual that *I* have:
6.3.140. signa
Hello,
Valerie Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 05 Apr 2000:
> I installed mutt 0.95.4 with pop option on a unix system : digital osf1 v4.0 .
Mutt 0.95.4 is pretty old, since 1.0.1 has been out for some time now.
Version 1.2 will hopefully be released in near future. You may want to
upgr
Hello,
First of all you had the address "danlip" (only your username)
in the Mail-Followup-To header in your email. That won't work of
course, because when I do a reply, it'll then try to sent a copy to
the user "danlip" on my system. You probably want to make Mutt use
your full address when se
Dear Mutt Users:
Is there a way to specify a program for a signiture file? I've tried
various ways without success and I've also browsed the site, the faq, and
the news archives.
I have a perl program which spits out a random saying. How do I make this
my signiture file?
I was thinking along t
Hello,
I installed mutt 0.95.4 with pop option on a unix system : digital osf1 v4.0 .
I would like to move automatically read mails from the spoolfile to the good mailbox.
I read that it 's possible with mbox-hook command, but it doesn't work!
In my .muttrc I wrote :
set move=no
mailboxes =IP
mbo
I was using mutt-1.0i. I just upgraded to mutt-1.1.10i.
My index_format var is
set index_format="%4C %Z %(%b %d %R) %15.15L [%5c] %s"
The old mutt would show the list for %L (if sent to a defined list).
The new mutt doesn't. It still recognizes the list when I do a
list reply however. What's
> I just played around with the $sort_aux variable and I came to the
> opinion that a third sorting key is needed. It's a bit annoying that
> $sort_aux controls how threads are sorted against other threads _and_
> the thread internal sorting.
No, it's not that to be annoying.
> My problem:
> I w
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 05 Apr 2000:
> You can forward selected attachments or tagged attachments from
> the attachment view menu (v) directly.
That doesn't really solve the problem, which was to add a random
attachment (only) from a random message in a random mail folder
> Suppose, Alice sent me a message with a large attachment. Suppose, that
> Bob sends me an email asking for Alice's message. I reply to it and
> Alice's message. However I do not want to send Bob
> full message with that huge attachment, I want just plain text. How do
> I do that? Playing
Hi all!
I just played around with the $sort_aux variable and I came to the
opinion that a third sorting key is needed. It's a bit annoying that
$sort_aux controls how threads are sorted against other threads _and_
the thread internal sorting.
My problem:
I want threads with the newest date sorte
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Grade said...
%
% Hi,
%
% does anyone know if there´s a mutt-version for win32 available?
In general, the answer is "no". The versions that folks have been
sort of] able to build under Win tend to have problems, and mutt
expects a whole slew of other *NIX pr
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 05 Apr 2000:
> I know I've seen this before, though... Is specifying a pipe this way
> different from something like
>
> set signature="`uptime`"
>
> where the " could also be ' ? Perhaps my original experimentation was
> using backticks and that's
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 12:53:52PM -0700, Mun Johl wrote:
> GJ> I sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it
> GJ> worked great.
>
> Worked for me too! Thanks for the tip. BTW, do I need to do anything
> special if I want to send email to the list?
No, nothing special. Just send mail to:
Hi,
Suppose, Alice sent me a message with a large attachment. Suppose, that
Bob sends me an email asking for Alice's message. I reply to it and
Alice's message. However I do not want to send Bob
full message with that huge attachment, I want just plain text. How do
I do that? Playing with m
Subba Rao wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I can create individual user aliases fine.
>How can I create an alias for a list of users ( about 30 )?
>
alias addr1, addr2, addr3
It's much easier if you already have aliases for the members of the list.
Then:
alias alias1, alias2, alias3
I didn't test whether you
Hi,
does anyone know if there´s a mutt-version for win32 available?
Thank you,
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Grade email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux-Page http://www.thgra.de
LUser #157433 http://counter.li.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 04 Apr 2000:
> 2) have a default fcc when replying to domain ncube.com of both
> +outgoing and +ncube/
As far as I know, there's no way in Mutt to do a Fcc into more than one
folder at a time. :-(
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Aaron --
...and then Aaron Schrab said...
% At 00:39 -0400 05 Apr 2000, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > % send-hook '(~C mutt)' "set signature="uptime|" ;my_hdr From: Neelakanth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "
% >
% > set signature='uptime|'
% >
% > so that it's parsed at hook-time instead o
On Tue, 04 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Second problem is OT. I want to have something check for new mail besides
> mutt. I use maildirs work computer and so don't worry about the notifiers
> destroying info that mutt wants. Does anyone have new mail notifiers that run
> under X that w
Hello,
* Sam Roberts wrote on 04 Apr 2000:
> I don't know if this is a gpg question, or a mutt one, but...
a gpg one ;-)
> I'd like mutt to not verify signatures that are not in my
> keyring, in particular I don't want gpg to trying to connect
> to the keyserver when I'm not on-line. How is gp
30 matches
Mail list logo
